Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

NoOneMan

(4,795 posts)

7. I don't think further complexity is going to help this situation

Reply to Post removed (Original post)

Mon Dec 31, 2012, 03:22 PM

Dec 2012

We probably need no parties at this point. No dependence. Regional resiliency. Simplification and reduction of consumption.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

11 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Post removed [View all] Post removed Dec 2012 OP

Yawn. Bye. nt babylonsister Dec 2012 #1

I've seen better exits BeyondGeography Dec 2012 #2

Dramatic, isn't he? Itchinjim Dec 2012 #3

Yeah, splintered parties would really make it easy to get things done, NOT! DrewFlorida Dec 2012 #4

Need my eyes checked. Wait Wut Dec 2012 #5

Passive Aggressive? Not nearly descriptive enough Siwsan Dec 2012 #6

I don't think further complexity is going to help this situation NoOneMan Dec 2012 #7

We would need a parliamentary system for that, although Cleita Dec 2012 #8

Thanks for all of your valuable support! Walk away Dec 2012 #9

Bye and Happy New Year! CakeGrrl Dec 2012 #10

GBCW!! PeaceNikki Dec 2012 #11

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Post removed»Reply #7