Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Warren DeMontague

(80,708 posts)
63. dont do it cant do it wont matter cant do it no specific definition of assault weapons nope cant do
Sun Dec 30, 2012, 11:03 PM
Dec 2012

it nope not gonna happen just tryin to help because theres no point nope dont bother so dont do it cant do it wont matter cant do it no specific definition of assault weapons nope cant do it nope not gonna happen just tryin to help because theres no point nope dont bother so dont do it cant do it wont matter cant do it no specific definition of assault weapons nope cant do it nope not gonna happen just tryin to help because theres no point nope dont bother so dont do it cant do it wont matter cant do it no specific definition of assault weapons nope cant do it nope not gonna happen just tryin to help because theres no point nope dont bother so dont do it cant do it wont matter cant do it no specific definition of assault weapons nope cant do it nope not gonna happen just tryin to help because theres no point nope dont bother so dont do it cant do it wont matter cant do it no specific definition of assault weapons nope cant do it nope not gonna happen just tryin to help because theres no point nope dont bother so dont do it cant do it wont matter cant do it no specific definition of assault weapons nope cant do it so

please stop talking about

TAKING TEH PRECIOUS AWAY

you know who else liked "lists?" datasuspect Dec 2012 #1
First response goes all Godwin RomneyLies Dec 2012 #2
tell me it isn't true. datasuspect Dec 2012 #4
What does that have to do with godwinning? Tien1985 Dec 2012 #12
you realize that it isn't an actual law datasuspect Dec 2012 #21
Uh huh Tien1985 Dec 2012 #28
"Hitler doesn't belong in this conversation, and bringing into it doesn't advance either side's datasuspect Dec 2012 #33
I hope your name ends up on a publicly published gun owner's list RomneyLies Dec 2012 #69
you failed to answer the series of questions datasuspect Dec 2012 #83
The US Eugenics Records Office also liked lists loyalsister Dec 2012 #42
There's nothing wrong with organizing information... Comrade_McKenzie Dec 2012 #87
I am of german decent. That was not nice. Lady Freedom Returns Dec 2012 #5
it's not about nice datasuspect Dec 2012 #6
Half of my family that was over there at that time was Nazis. Lady Freedom Returns Dec 2012 #9
characterize or describe any actual damage. datasuspect Dec 2012 #10
We are losing people due to that stunt by that paper. Lady Freedom Returns Dec 2012 #41
Godwinned on the very first reply. Lizzie Poppet Dec 2012 #18
i can publish the ideas in coloring book format (.pdf) datasuspect Dec 2012 #23
A singularly appropriate format for "ideas" of that sort. Lizzie Poppet Dec 2012 #30
bless your heart datasuspect Dec 2012 #34
Same to you! Lizzie Poppet Dec 2012 #35
You are conveniently ignoring the fact billh58 Dec 2012 #48
Also, telephone companies and Guinness World Records. NYC Liberal Dec 2012 #56
the NRA does - they have quite an expansive "enemies" list... villager Dec 2012 #77
Klimt! JVS Dec 2012 #81
Owning guns has consequences RomneyLies Dec 2012 #3
Do you have an idea on how to fix the damage that has been done by that paper? Lady Freedom Returns Dec 2012 #7
Yes. Let gun owners dispose of them, and newspaper run free full page announcement of people Hoyt Dec 2012 #14
You think a bunch of ticked off gun owners will do that? Lady Freedom Returns Dec 2012 #25
No, but the ones left will be the bigoted right wingers. Hoyt Dec 2012 #32
See, now there you go with a generalization that cannot on its BEST DAY happen statistically... cherokeeprogressive Dec 2012 #71
What, you guys aren't as law-abiding/moral/responsible as you claim? Hoyt Dec 2012 #74
They did a PUBLIC SERVICE RomneyLies Dec 2012 #53
What a load of self-righteous bullcrap slackmaster Dec 2012 #88
They certainly are not helping. Which makes me wonder about their stated intentions. bluerum Dec 2012 #8
That is why we must put our minds together. Lady Freedom Returns Dec 2012 #13
silly. registered weapons should not be open to public scrutiny and won't be. spanone Dec 2012 #11
The cat is out of the bag. The precedent has been set. Lady Freedom Returns Dec 2012 #16
Public opinion Tien1985 Dec 2012 #17
+1 Lady Freedom Returns Dec 2012 #20
Jesus, only if you let them nadinbrzezinski Dec 2012 #15
That's just it. They want us to go to sleep on this. Lady Freedom Returns Dec 2012 #19
Go give some money to the Brady Campaign nadinbrzezinski Dec 2012 #24
Not just that will help. Lady Freedom Returns Dec 2012 #31
Have you fed your congress critter? nadinbrzezinski Dec 2012 #36
They watch the polls to see how they can keep their job. To know what they should back.. Lady Freedom Returns Dec 2012 #46
And it is time we play the same game nadinbrzezinski Dec 2012 #47
You must hate Harry Reid! Crackinrocket Dec 2012 #57
He is not my senator nadinbrzezinski Dec 2012 #61
You're such a principled individual. Bravo! Crackinrocket Dec 2012 #65
And another billh58 Dec 2012 #85
Yup, but also arming, no pun nadinbrzezinski Dec 2012 #99
Oh, the brady "we don't push for gun bans" campaign... beevul Dec 2012 #98
The names of the local high school graduates are also published in the papers. Squinch Dec 2012 #22
Gun owners are trying to have it both ways nadinbrzezinski Dec 2012 #26
There is a belief in gun culture that you are safer if no one knows you have it. Lady Freedom Returns Dec 2012 #27
Why are you safer if no one knows? I thought the point was for people to know you are armed. Squinch Dec 2012 #38
No, the point is for no one to know. Mojorabbit Dec 2012 #62
It's a secret desire of gun onwers RomneyLies Dec 2012 #70
People who want guns for protection defacto7 Dec 2012 #79
Yes, their names. But not their HOME ADDRESSES. slackmaster Dec 2012 #89
The phone book publishes home addresses. A host of public sources publish home Squinch Dec 2012 #92
My home address doesn't appear in the San Diego phone book, and if I gave you my real name... slackmaster Dec 2012 #93
I thought, by definition, "law abiding citizens" don't break the law? jmg257 Dec 2012 #29
Their not, right now. Lady Freedom Returns Dec 2012 #37
There are likely a couple 100 million unregistered guns out there right now. jmg257 Dec 2012 #40
Lady Freedom Returns what proposed "gun-control" solution do you support? nt jody Dec 2012 #39
Mine is a mix of many. Lady Freedom Returns Dec 2012 #43
Thanks. Problems and possibly solutions are different for cities with the highest jody Dec 2012 #45
Record gun and ammo sales right now. L0oniX Dec 2012 #44
LOL Robb Dec 2012 #49
If a person is a "proud gun owner" quaker bill Dec 2012 #50
They are afraid of the government, not criminals davidn3600 Dec 2012 #55
But apparently the government already knows quaker bill Dec 2012 #67
One Quaker to another - are you a proud voter? derby378 Dec 2012 #72
One Quaker to another, that would be a yes. quaker bill Dec 2012 #82
I would counter, that just because it CAN be published doesn't mean it SHOULD derby378 Dec 2012 #86
...Carry thy gun as long as thou can'st.... quaker bill Dec 2012 #97
I wouldn't care if my name was listed for having guns Kaleva Dec 2012 #51
oh for pete's sake.... mike_c Dec 2012 #52
Exactly its happened in several other counties north of Rockland.... Historic NY Dec 2012 #59
I checked a couple gun forums sarisataka Dec 2012 #54
Some mind some don't Lady Freedom Returns Dec 2012 #75
Don't publish *public records*? NYC Liberal Dec 2012 #58
So you don't mind the publisher, editor, and several reporters getting doxed, either? Lizzie Poppet Dec 2012 #76
Not if they're all public records NYC Liberal Dec 2012 #80
Thanks for the reply. And the consistency. Lizzie Poppet Dec 2012 #95
Sometimes public records are too easy to access slackmaster Dec 2012 #91
They were wrong, but they're not representative of us all timesamillion Dec 2012 #60
dont do it cant do it wont matter cant do it no specific definition of assault weapons nope cant do Warren DeMontague Dec 2012 #63
Oh bullshit. Zoeisright Dec 2012 #64
lol ........no it hasn't uponit7771 Dec 2012 #66
Makes good sense to publish the names of gun owners. Let's neighbors know who has one, who doesn't. JDPriestly Dec 2012 #68
The burglars and home invaders of America lend their moral support derby378 Dec 2012 #73
Huh? The NRA has hacked your DU account??? madinmaryland Dec 2012 #78
Publishing names is just a petulant and vindictive act Union Scribe Dec 2012 #84
What's really messed up is New York's laws that allow the newspaper to access that information... slackmaster Dec 2012 #90
I would love to know what they were looking to accomplish by publishing the names crazyjoe Dec 2012 #94
It's not hard to figure out. They're trying to sell more newspapers by ginning up controversy. slackmaster Dec 2012 #96
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»The Journal News has hurt...»Reply #63