General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: This message was self-deleted by its author [View all]Moonwalk
(2,322 posts)...homosexuals were any danger to kids (i.e. any more than heterosexuals). We do have proof, more than enough proof, that guns are a danger to kids. And this is why "dead kids"--heck, dead anyone--is a valid argument for gun control where "danger to kids" is not a valid argument when it comes to homosexuals.
But I do appreciate the fact that if conservatives can use "Protect the Children!" as a way to ram through legislation that we shouldn't give up hope that we can do the same using that same battle cry. Good idea.
And I think that you're the one who is "Lovejoying" as you seem to want to oppose any dissent to your arguments. You're doing this by using another logical fallacy "name-calling." Meaning you don't listen to what the opposition has to say when they bring up children, you just call them a name and, thus, dismiss their side of the argument in the exact way you say they're dismissing yours.