Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Botany

(70,501 posts)
80. Be it a clip or a magazine they both do the exact same thing ....
Wed Dec 26, 2012, 12:28 AM
Dec 2012

..... and that is to hold the rounds before one round winds up in the firing
chamber of the gun at which after the trigger is squeezed the firing
pin hits the primer (or the rim in the case of a rim fired round) after
which the gun powder ignites which sends the projectile down the gun
barrel and then out into the environment which might be a movie theater,
a first grade class room, or a house fire in upstate NY and if that slug hits
a person they might very well wind up just as dead no matter if the weapon
had a clip, a magazine, or it was a single shot bolt action rifle.

The issue is not clips vs magazines but the proliferation of guns and a
proliferation of different methods with which a person can increase
the amount of times a weapon can be fired with out reloading.

Um...no, you are so wrong. ZombieHorde Dec 2012 #1
Your answer is incomplete. Chorophyll Dec 2012 #34
This message was self-deleted by its author ann--- Dec 2012 #126
whatever quinnox Dec 2012 #2
Post removed Post removed Dec 2012 #3
Jeez man, I hope that was sarcasm. They aren't sheep. Kurska Dec 2012 #4
No it's not sarcasm. Indydem Dec 2012 #9
You should never call your fellow Democrats or Americans sheep. Kurska Dec 2012 #12
There are sheep everywhere. Indydem Dec 2012 #13
I'm sorry you feel that way. Kurska Dec 2012 #14
I was on the jury for your hidden post, above. Nice transparency page. Electric Monk Dec 2012 #65
yup Skittles Dec 2012 #78
wow, scary shit. I'm making a major donation to the Brady Org in his name. bettyellen Dec 2012 #82
I'm laughing, but also think it's great! Squinch Dec 2012 #93
a lot of them own a lot of guns Skittles Dec 2012 #77
they need to put some distance between themselves and the batshit angry gun owners bettyellen Dec 2012 #83
So you consider knowledge of gun terminology to be an indicator of educational achievement? Squinch Dec 2012 #33
My nephew believes his knowledge of every Pokemon ever created is an achievement.... bettyellen Dec 2012 #99
So what's the problem with using clip vs magazine? rbixby Dec 2012 #67
Well in this instance one is correct and the other is incorrect. Kurska Dec 2012 #68
I'm just wondering what the consequences of using the wrong one in this discussion are rbixby Dec 2012 #133
Nothing, other than ... oldhippie Dec 2012 #136
By using vague and incomplete terms it allows the debate to change direction on a whim. Remmah2 Dec 2012 #147
Gun grabbers? Really? Sekhmets Daughter Dec 2012 #151
gun grabbers? are you on the right forum? eom ellenfl Dec 2012 #153
like I said, real touchy quinnox Dec 2012 #6
That the rest of us aren't up on the terminology of their hobby. Squinch Dec 2012 #31
exactly quinnox Dec 2012 #50
I just explained the terminology to you. If you continue to use it incorrectly Kurska Dec 2012 #56
I believe many in the media are purposely misusing the term .... oldhippie Dec 2012 #137
Prove It. (nt) Paladin Dec 2012 #157
I can't prove it .... oldhippie Dec 2012 #161
That's fine. However if you make a good point in the gun control debate and use the wrong terms ... spin Dec 2012 #154
Sleep it off. RandiFan1290 Dec 2012 #8
Most people don't own guns and are not interested upaloopa Dec 2012 #5
It is really too much to ask if you're going to talk about guns to use the correct words? Kurska Dec 2012 #10
I asked once in DU, but the answer I got wasn't clear... Honeycombe8 Dec 2012 #32
Thank you for making the distinction. pangaia Dec 2012 #37
Gun knowledge upaloopa Dec 2012 #71
A more apt comparison would be.... Fastcars Dec 2012 #130
Wow! I haven't run into anyone that knows of that distinction ..... oldhippie Dec 2012 #138
The two are used interchangeably -- LTX Dec 2012 #148
Not an engineer.... Fastcars Dec 2012 #162
I don't own guns, but I like the knowing the terms. nt ZombieHorde Dec 2012 #41
Therefore your posts on the topic are far more effective than a post from an individual .... spin Dec 2012 #156
The difference is irrelevant to most people. Spider Jerusalem Dec 2012 #7
Ignorance is only an excuse if you're ignorant. Kurska Dec 2012 #11
People probably use the terms interchangeably.... OldDem2012 Dec 2012 #21
You really think people would do that? Just go on the internet and act stupid to make people mad? Kurska Dec 2012 #28
It worked in your case, didn't it? (filed under: "no sarcasm", and "truth hurts".) OldDem2012 Dec 2012 #121
Ummmm, yes. nt oldhippie Dec 2012 #139
doesn't change national debate I need to be good smart gun regulations uponit7771 Dec 2012 #22
Not even talking about that Kurska Dec 2012 #26
Dude, talking to the gun grabbers right now is like trying to talk to a dog OffWithTheirHeads Dec 2012 #38
Ignorance about all things firearm are like Kudzu, impossible to eradicate. nt jody Dec 2012 #15
May I suggest you stop trying to argue on technicalities. The meaning is perfectly clear. BlueStreak Dec 2012 #16
I'm not arguing. Just trying to educate. Kurska Dec 2012 #18
I think BlueStreak is about the fourth person in this thread to make the same point, Chorophyll Dec 2012 #40
You aren't "educating". You are playing word games to change the subject. BlueStreak Dec 2012 #55
that is the feeling I get as well quinnox Dec 2012 #57
This thread has a subject, you're free to start a thread on any gun control topic you like. Kurska Dec 2012 #58
this subject has already been covered in EVERY other thread about guns. I can't respect your opinion bettyellen Dec 2012 #111
If it had, I'd hope people weren't still making mistakes about it n/t Kurska Dec 2012 #115
so you failed to notice many here saying they didn't give a fuck because they are not here to write bettyellen Dec 2012 #116
It is an incredibly simple concept Kurska Dec 2012 #119
yet you fail to grasp the dozen explanations on this page? i'll add one more.... bettyellen Dec 2012 #120
But, but, we haven't discussed the finer points of navel lint yet!!! How can the OP poster take you Squinch Dec 2012 #150
+10000000 Squinch Dec 2012 #35
If so your side should be honest and push for the banning and confiscation ... spin Dec 2012 #158
The difference is really very clear RomneyLies Dec 2012 #17
Even the gun-bunnies call them clips when they're not lecturing us on terminology. backscatter712 Dec 2012 #19
When did I imply pro-gun people don't make this mistake too? n/t Kurska Dec 2012 #29
Just making an observation about right-wing hypocrisy, that's all. backscatter712 Dec 2012 #73
I know this but will still file it under "W" Bonobo Dec 2012 #20
Distinction with 20 kids dead regardless. morningfog Dec 2012 #23
^^This. Chorophyll Dec 2012 #43
Fuck guns. nt NYC Liberal Dec 2012 #24
Dont even try, so many here dont know the proper terminology for weapons NightWatcher Dec 2012 #25
Some people don't know how to use an apostrophe. I happen to think apostrophes are important. Squinch Dec 2012 #46
Getting all up in arms about proper terminology is just a misdirection dballance Dec 2012 #27
I'm sorry, but if you want to be taken seriously you should get your terminology correct. Kurska Dec 2012 #30
Actually I have always wondered why pangaia Dec 2012 #44
I believe it is because the American football is derivitive of the European football. Kurska Dec 2012 #48
Looks like it came from an ancient greek game and pangaia Dec 2012 #132
I would be willing to bet the house that you've weighed in on topics on DU for which Chorophyll Dec 2012 #47
Of course and if I made a mistake I would expect to be corrected on it. Kurska Dec 2012 #51
And yet, I don't really see "terminology correction" threads about anything other Chorophyll Dec 2012 #59
Can you explain something to me? Kurska Dec 2012 #62
I agree. so get it right yourself. NashvilleLefty Dec 2012 #49
It is a common mistake. Kurska Dec 2012 #52
We have just watched twenty 6 year olds mowed down in their first grade class. Squinch Dec 2012 #60
Why would a tragedy change the fact that people should use the correct terminology? Kurska Dec 2012 #66
If I told you, "I can't take someone seriously when they talk about terrorism if they Squinch Dec 2012 #74
If they repeatedly and willfully did it after being informed of the fact. Kurska Dec 2012 #76
Okie dokie. So I guess we know not to try and talk to you if you have educated us about what is Squinch Dec 2012 #81
If getting things correct is not important to you, I believe that is your problem. n/t Kurska Dec 2012 #85
That's nice, dear. Squinch Dec 2012 #90
As an aside: Putting n/t in the topic when you have a blank post is helpful. Kurska Dec 2012 #96
I believe my terminology is quite correct dballance Dec 2012 #124
Doesn't matter. Both feed ammo into guns that should be banned, except possibly bolt action. Hoyt Dec 2012 #36
Post removed Post removed Dec 2012 #39
Sir, have I wronged you in some way? Kurska Dec 2012 #45
Ever hear of a "banana clip"? NashvilleLefty Dec 2012 #42
"Banana clip" Kurska Dec 2012 #53
For someone who claims to be an "expert" NashvilleLefty Dec 2012 #101
Many states have limits on the magazine capacity of a semi-auto firearm while hunting. spin Dec 2012 #159
Guns are rather complicated one-dimensional items BeyondGeography Dec 2012 #54
Please look at this article... Sancho Dec 2012 #61
The M1 garand is a special case Kurska Dec 2012 #64
Actually, that would be an enbloc clip. -..__... Dec 2012 #106
That is a type of clip, did I call it a stripper clip? Kurska Dec 2012 #114
No... you didn't. -..__... Dec 2012 #117
No worries Kurska Dec 2012 #118
There are lots of exceptions, like the "hopper" that holds bullets... Sancho Dec 2012 #125
That is correct because the M-1 Garand has an internal fixed magazine ..... oldhippie Dec 2012 #141
This message was self-deleted by its author RedCappedBandit Dec 2012 #63
A magazine is something I read on the toilet. A bullet and a gun are wmd's. graham4anything Dec 2012 #69
ITT: a zillion variants on "I can't be bothered to be correct and right at the same time." (nt) Posteritatis Dec 2012 #70
I think the deck chairs would look better over THERE. Robb Dec 2012 #72
. Squinch Dec 2012 #75
And to add mine... RC Dec 2012 #88
You're fighting a losing battle here tularetom Dec 2012 #79
Be it a clip or a magazine they both do the exact same thing .... Botany Dec 2012 #80
Correct. All this 'clip' vs 'magazine' is nothing more than a distraction that we have RC Dec 2012 #92
100% NRA / gun nut talking point Botany Dec 2012 #131
The head of the Connecticut State Police called them clips. We understand the gun held doc03 Dec 2012 #84
Well that is awfully silly. Kurska Dec 2012 #87
Why don't you run up to Sandy Hook, and go educate this "annoying" man right away! bettyellen Dec 2012 #104
When did I ever call anyone annoying? Kurska Dec 2012 #113
Aw, fuck that tired old noise. bluedigger Dec 2012 #86
+1 I guess we should be impressed with his knowledge of the proper doc03 Dec 2012 #98
+2 Squinch Dec 2012 #102
Well Put. (nt) Paladin Dec 2012 #134
you are wasting your time guardian Dec 2012 #89
As I thought. Even the gun lovers don't know which killing machine is what. RC Dec 2012 #95
You should have put a comma after "Look". It's hard to take you seriously. nt Bonobo Dec 2012 #91
Oh, let me fix that. Kurska Dec 2012 #97
I wouldn't start an OP about how I can't communicate with people who misuse commas. nt Bonobo Dec 2012 #100
Wowza, I sure won't make that mistake again Kurska Dec 2012 #112
How about I don't give a shit! Le Taz Hot Dec 2012 #94
Let the willfully ignorent call them whatever they want... -..__... Dec 2012 #103
why pretend to be helpful with this? You admittedly don't want good legislation written. bettyellen Dec 2012 #105
"Good legislation"? -..__... Dec 2012 #108
you think any regulation on guns sucks. but the majority of americans do not. you are fringe.... bettyellen Dec 2012 #110
Yup. I have no problem banning greater than 10 round clips ..... oldhippie Dec 2012 #144
I Don't Need To Know The Lurid Details Of Gun Jargon To Facilitate The Criminalization Of Gun Ownership cantbeserious Dec 2012 #107
"lurid" Lizzie Poppet Dec 2012 #142
we shouldn't use either word farminator3000 Dec 2012 #109
You have far greater patience than I. HubertHeaver Dec 2012 #122
Also clip is the term Hasbro uses for their Nerf line of toys. Matt_R Dec 2012 #123
We get our hair clipped, but we read the magazine while we wait liberal N proud Dec 2012 #127
Gun Activist Esoterics, And Nothing More. Paladin Dec 2012 #128
Using "Classroom Clips" creates less confusion that using "Classroom Magazines". ehrenfeucht games Dec 2012 #129
And generates more hysterical emotion, too. Lizzie Poppet Dec 2012 #143
Also, it's "perforating," not "penetrating." JEEZ!!! Robb Dec 2012 #135
Who fucking cares? 99Forever Dec 2012 #140
I'll see your magazines and raise you one en bloc clip slackmaster Dec 2012 #145
Roach clip! Remmah2 Dec 2012 #146
I'm sure you've noticed the general resistance to gun tech-talk in this thread -- LTX Dec 2012 #149
Well, in fairness, if somebody doesn't know the difference between A and B, and talks about banning Recursion Dec 2012 #152
Can it shoot lots of bullets really fast? LTX Dec 2012 #155
And gun manufacturers tried to build products that skirted the technical definitions BlueStreak Dec 2012 #160
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Look, if we're going to h...»Reply #80