Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Police Wonder If They’ll Need To Confiscate Assault Weapons In Event Of Ban [View all]freshwest
(53,661 posts)48. Whoa, please. When you say:
Why are they talking about it instead of doing it?
The answer is in how the process of government works. The cops don't make the laws, only the legislatures make the laws, a well-known fact.
Because they know if they get those things off of the streets, they'll be less need for cops.Taking them off of the streets is bad for business.
Police forces across the country are suffering cuts in funding and some don't even come out to some towns because they are being disbanded and crime has gone up when that's happened. Those threads are on DU.
There is no benefit to the police to have assault weapons all over the place. Those weapons being in the hands of the public lessens their chances of going home alive. Cops don't want that and most support the Brady Bill.
You might want to re-think how you come to the conclusion that cops can enforce laws not yet written and why they'd enjoy more people being able to gun them down along with the rest of the public. Perhaps you'd change your views.
BTW, I want those all of those guns taken away. The military is the only ones who need them. Just my particular view.
Peace Out.
The answer is in how the process of government works. The cops don't make the laws, only the legislatures make the laws, a well-known fact.
Because they know if they get those things off of the streets, they'll be less need for cops.Taking them off of the streets is bad for business.
Police forces across the country are suffering cuts in funding and some don't even come out to some towns because they are being disbanded and crime has gone up when that's happened. Those threads are on DU.
There is no benefit to the police to have assault weapons all over the place. Those weapons being in the hands of the public lessens their chances of going home alive. Cops don't want that and most support the Brady Bill.
You might want to re-think how you come to the conclusion that cops can enforce laws not yet written and why they'd enjoy more people being able to gun them down along with the rest of the public. Perhaps you'd change your views.
BTW, I want those all of those guns taken away. The military is the only ones who need them. Just my particular view.
Peace Out.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
56 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Police Wonder If They’ll Need To Confiscate Assault Weapons In Event Of Ban [View all]
former-republican
Dec 2012
OP
We might disagree over how to handle semi-auto firearms but we both understand reality. (n/t)
spin
Dec 2012
#38
Talking rather than doing is standard behavior for people who live in dream worlds
slackmaster
Dec 2012
#34
the legal definition WILL BE what ever the legislation makes it to be. Just like last time, but
bettyellen
Dec 2012
#39
True, owners of such guns are not as law-abiding or responsible as we have been told.
Hoyt
Dec 2012
#54
I think with bill boards with the faces of the victims of gun violence where placed across America
warrior1
Dec 2012
#23
My bet is that one of the compromises of upcoming legislation would include a grandfather clause.
backscatter712
Dec 2012
#36
1. Very few owners will relinquish their assault weapons even with a voluntary buy-back program.
no_hypocrisy
Dec 2012
#52