General Discussion

billh58

(6,635 posts)

35. No, but they

Reply to dairydog91 (Reply #11)

Sun Dec 23, 2012, 11:42 PM

Dec 2012

can tax and regulate the shit out of them.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

42 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Brownells sold THREE AND A HALF YEARS of 30 round magazines in THREE DAYS [View all] DainBramaged Dec 2012 OP

You know the story of Pandora exboyfil Dec 2012 #1

Yeah, all that "we're gonna take all yer guns away" talk is working out OffWithTheirHeads Dec 2012 #2

Prohibition Jim Warren Dec 2012 #3

where is the radical prohibition here? I don't see any, just gun and ammo proliferation wordpix Dec 2012 #26

Actually, that's what radical billh58 Dec 2012 #34

Since I am neither Jim Warren Dec 2012 #40

Only the NRA and billh58 Dec 2012 #41

That is why banning these things will not work. People will always have them. Logical Dec 2012 #4

So? Does that mean we should just give up and not attempt to Laurian Dec 2012 #16

Unless we can repossess them, which I think is illegal, then mass shooters will find a way to.... Logical Dec 2012 #17

It's a question of finding them. dairydog91 Dec 2012 #18

I think you have to pay people for stuff you take from them is they acquired them legally. Logical Dec 2012 #19

Your good intentions don't save lives, I'm afraid. ComplimentarySwine Dec 2012 #25

We should ban them and the ammo. They can stockpile, but they also can't morningfog Dec 2012 #20

You will never ban ammo. n-t Logical Dec 2012 #21

We can start with the guns. It will reduce the number over time, despiste the paranoia-buying. morningfog Dec 2012 #23

Over the last 4 years the Democratic party has been a god send for gun shops davidn3600 Dec 2012 #5

There are virtually no "assault weapons" and their magazines available for sale right now. Lizzie Poppet Dec 2012 #6

s LiberalMadeline Dec 2012 #33

I hope Brownells have properly documented as to who now owns them Panasonic Dec 2012 #7

Yeah, and I want a pony that shits glitter but it is not going to happen. OffWithTheirHeads Dec 2012 #9

And since passing ex post facto laws is strictly prohibited by the Constitution, Brownells is fine. dairydog91 Dec 2012 #11

Don't care. It's is going to be illegal. Panasonic Dec 2012 #12

So? Brownells need not care at this point. dairydog91 Dec 2012 #14

No, but they billh58 Dec 2012 #35

Paraniod hoarders. TheCowsCameHome Dec 2012 #8

You can call them all the dimuitive names you want but OffWithTheirHeads Dec 2012 #10

We start arresting people who is carrying illegally as in semi-automatics and automatic guns Panasonic Dec 2012 #13

Amen blueamy66 Dec 2012 #15

What about legal semi-autos? nt Llewlladdwr Dec 2012 #24

That poster does not believe there should be any semi autos ProgressiveProfessor Dec 2012 #30

"We?" Lizzie Poppet Dec 2012 #42

Continue to call them names. Their paranoia and hate will get the best of them. morningfog Dec 2012 #22

Ban ammo? ComplimentarySwine Dec 2012 #27

The same place that other countries' billh58 Dec 2012 #36

Oh my. They're already preparing for a black market. That's a weird thing to buy, even for Honeycombe8 Dec 2012 #28

some of it might be speculators/scalpers/whatever eShirl Dec 2012 #29

I've seen this before and it is an interesting demonstration of capitalism in action ProgressiveProfessor Dec 2012 #31

s LiberalMadeline Dec 2012 #32

Bub bye... billh58 Dec 2012 #37

Oh bill... tavernier Dec 2012 #38

Yep, it's efffed up. A follow up thought might be... 99Forever Dec 2012 #39