HomeLatest ThreadsGreatest ThreadsForums & GroupsMy SubscriptionsMy Posts
DU Home » Latest Threads » Forums & Groups » Main » General Discussion (Forum) » Report: White House Consi... » Reply #46

Response to hfojvt (Reply #43)

Sat Dec 22, 2012, 05:57 PM

46. Actually, it's a

slight increase for the top one percent because there are also tax increases built into the health care law.

http://www.taxpolicycenter.org/numbers/displayatab.cfm?Docid=3210&DocTypeID=2




<...>



Under Clinton, the top 1 percent paid 33.4 percent; under Bush it paid 29.8 percent; and under Obama it would go back up to 35.3 percent, less than two points than under Clinton.

Meanwhile, under Clinton, the top 0.1 percent paid 36.9 percent; under Bush it paid 32.8 percent; and under Obama it would go back up to 39.7 percent. By contrast, every other group would be paying lower rates under Obamaís proposals than under Clinton. (A table detailing these numbers is right here.)

Itís true that the top 1 percent and the top 0.1 percent would be paying more. But the significance of those hikes shrivel dramatically when you consider how much better these folks have fared over time than everyone else has. The highest end hikes shrivel in the context of the towering size of their after-tax incomes ó and the degree to which they dwarf those of everyone else, something that has increased dramatically in recent years.

- more -

http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/plum-line/post/how-obamas-tax-hikes-will-really-impact-the-rich-in-three-easy-charts/2011/03/03/gIQAmbbLIL_blog.html

Reply to this post

Back to OP Alert abuse Link to post in-thread

Always highlight: 10 newest replies | Replies posted after I mark a forum
Replies to this discussion thread
Arrow 56 replies Author Time Post
ProSense Dec 2012 OP
Skinner Dec 2012 #1
ProSense Dec 2012 #4
Fridays Child Dec 2012 #2
lasttrip Dec 2012 #3
frazzled Dec 2012 #5
julian09 Dec 2012 #12
jrobbi Dec 2012 #6
DCBob Dec 2012 #7
Mr Peabody Dec 2012 #8
ProSense Dec 2012 #9
Enrique Dec 2012 #23
ProSense Dec 2012 #24
Enrique Dec 2012 #27
ProSense Dec 2012 #29
Proud Liberal Dem Dec 2012 #10
bigtree Dec 2012 #11
Lone_Star_Dem Dec 2012 #13
magical thyme Dec 2012 #14
Liberalynn Dec 2012 #15
Autumn Dec 2012 #16
kentuck Dec 2012 #17
hfojvt Dec 2012 #18
ProSense Dec 2012 #19
kentuck Dec 2012 #20
ProSense Dec 2012 #21
kentuck Dec 2012 #22
Panasonic Dec 2012 #36
hfojvt Dec 2012 #26
ProSense Dec 2012 #30
hfojvt Dec 2012 #39
ProSense Dec 2012 #41
hfojvt Dec 2012 #45
ProSense Dec 2012 #52
woo me with science Dec 2012 #34
hfojvt Dec 2012 #40
woo me with science Dec 2012 #25
ProSense Dec 2012 #31
woo me with science Dec 2012 #32
ProSense Dec 2012 #35
woo me with science Dec 2012 #37
ProSense Dec 2012 #38
hfojvt Dec 2012 #42
ProSense Dec 2012 #44
hfojvt Dec 2012 #47
ProSense Dec 2012 #50
woo me with science Dec 2012 #53
ProSense Dec 2012 #54
hfojvt Dec 2012 #43
LineLineLineLineLineLineReply Actually, it's a
ProSense Dec 2012 #46
hfojvt Dec 2012 #49
ProSense Dec 2012 #51
woo me with science Dec 2012 #55
AndyTiedye Dec 2012 #28
Scurrilous Dec 2012 #33
Faryn Balyncd Dec 2012 #48
spanone Dec 2012 #56
Please login to view edit histories.