Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: "Smart guns" show promise, but not readily available on U.S. market [View all]farminator3000
(2,117 posts)33. hee hee
how about "keeping your fly unzipped being necessary to a well-regulated populace, the right to BARE your johnson shall not be infringed?"
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
69 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
"Smart guns" show promise, but not readily available on U.S. market [View all]
farminator3000
Dec 2012
OP
We've come to a pretty pass when we're talking about machinery to keep us from
CTyankee
Dec 2012
#22
I see the absurdity in a society that feels it necessary to do this to restrain its lunatics.
CTyankee
Dec 2012
#46
I am talking about countries where kids don't regularly shoot themselves by accident
CTyankee
Dec 2012
#53
It not nearly as ready as the guy who is going to make money off it claims.
ProgressiveProfessor
Dec 2012
#2
How would identifying the user prevent accidents or is there more in the article.
Mojorabbit
Dec 2012
#23
There's about 4 inches between my wrist & mid palm. I'm a med ht woman with small hands, size 5
Honeycombe8
Dec 2012
#49
then again, the ONLY answer is to clasify semiautomatic weapons identically to automatic weapons.
RomneyLies
Dec 2012
#19
It isn't available because the vast majority of firearms owners don't want it
Taitertots
Dec 2012
#25
How about directly from the mouth of the executive director of the VPC in the article
Taitertots
Dec 2012
#39
Basically you just want to ignore anyone who disagrees with what you want to hear from the article.
Taitertots
Dec 2012
#45
You just want to disagree with anyone who isn't telling you what you want to hear
Taitertots
Dec 2012
#54