In the discussion thread: Report: White House Considers Smaller Fiscal Cliff Deal [View all]
Response to ProSense (Reply #19)
Sat Dec 22, 2012, 12:40 PM
hfojvt (37,573 posts)
26. no, actually it keeps many of those tax cuts for the rich
the top 1% still get $40 billion a year in tax cuts
the top 4% still get another $40 billion a year in tax cuts and the other 15% that makes up the top 20% get another $80 billion a year in tax cuts $160 billion a year in tax cuts for the top 20% $42 billion a year in tax cuts for the bottom 40% clearly a plan that favors the rich and actually it is not Boehner's problem to get it past the House. He can take the high ground and swat that offer away. Clearly with this offer a) the President is not being bi-partisan, because he is only offering his original tax plan and b) is doing nothing about our serious long term debt problems. Heck, how does this plan even pass the Senate? |
Always highlight: 10 newest replies | Replies posted after I mark a forum
Replies to this discussion thread
![]() |
Author | Time | Post |
ProSense | Dec 2012 | OP | |
Skinner | Dec 2012 | #1 | |
ProSense | Dec 2012 | #4 | |
Fridays Child | Dec 2012 | #2 | |
lasttrip | Dec 2012 | #3 | |
frazzled | Dec 2012 | #5 | |
julian09 | Dec 2012 | #12 | |
jrobbi | Dec 2012 | #6 | |
DCBob | Dec 2012 | #7 | |
Mr Peabody | Dec 2012 | #8 | |
ProSense | Dec 2012 | #9 | |
Enrique | Dec 2012 | #23 | |
ProSense | Dec 2012 | #24 | |
Enrique | Dec 2012 | #27 | |
ProSense | Dec 2012 | #29 | |
Proud Liberal Dem | Dec 2012 | #10 | |
bigtree | Dec 2012 | #11 | |
Lone_Star_Dem | Dec 2012 | #13 | |
magical thyme | Dec 2012 | #14 | |
Liberalynn | Dec 2012 | #15 | |
Autumn | Dec 2012 | #16 | |
kentuck | Dec 2012 | #17 | |
hfojvt | Dec 2012 | #18 | |
ProSense | Dec 2012 | #19 | |
kentuck | Dec 2012 | #20 | |
ProSense | Dec 2012 | #21 | |
kentuck | Dec 2012 | #22 | |
Panasonic | Dec 2012 | #36 | |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
hfojvt | Dec 2012 | #26 |
ProSense | Dec 2012 | #30 | |
hfojvt | Dec 2012 | #39 | |
ProSense | Dec 2012 | #41 | |
hfojvt | Dec 2012 | #45 | |
ProSense | Dec 2012 | #52 | |
woo me with science | Dec 2012 | #34 | |
hfojvt | Dec 2012 | #40 | |
woo me with science | Dec 2012 | #25 | |
ProSense | Dec 2012 | #31 | |
woo me with science | Dec 2012 | #32 | |
ProSense | Dec 2012 | #35 | |
woo me with science | Dec 2012 | #37 | |
ProSense | Dec 2012 | #38 | |
hfojvt | Dec 2012 | #42 | |
ProSense | Dec 2012 | #44 | |
hfojvt | Dec 2012 | #47 | |
ProSense | Dec 2012 | #50 | |
woo me with science | Dec 2012 | #53 | |
ProSense | Dec 2012 | #54 | |
hfojvt | Dec 2012 | #43 | |
ProSense | Dec 2012 | #46 | |
hfojvt | Dec 2012 | #49 | |
ProSense | Dec 2012 | #51 | |
woo me with science | Dec 2012 | #55 | |
AndyTiedye | Dec 2012 | #28 | |
Scurrilous | Dec 2012 | #33 | |
Faryn Balyncd | Dec 2012 | #48 | |
spanone | Dec 2012 | #56 |
Edit History
Please login to view edit histories.