Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

rbennettucm

(11 posts)
15. Skeptical
Sat Dec 22, 2012, 06:21 AM
Dec 2012

I'm honestly not sure that we are capable as a society anymore of engaging in an open, honest, rhetoric free, pundit-free, and gamesmanship-free discussion about such a loaded topic. I hope I am wrong. I am afraid I am not.

If we have any hope left at all, I believe whole-heartedly that we must ban ALL politicians from the participating; they are necessarily biased and almost guaranteed to have an agenda from the outset and both are huge liabilities if we are to have any shot at all at meaningful and civil debate. The scariest part of the equation from where I sit is the newly discovered NRA penchant for gauging the public's reaction and biding their time before making public statements following another tragedy. After the Cleveland shooting the NRA could hardly keep it together for 24 hours...and the public had much lower expectations. This week was a test that they passed with flying colors; Advanced SocioPolitical Manipulation of the Masses via Delayed Satisfaction. The public was told that the NRA would make a statement today...and HUNDREDS of MILLIONS of people were on pins and needles in anticipation. They managed, in their silence, to appear reverent, thoughtful, even considerate of the need for families of the dead children to be given time to at least bury their loved ones before the real battle of the talking heads commenced. It was a first in NRA publicity moves that don't make them look like crazies clutching their shiny new guns and antiquated amendment - but rather a public interest lobby with real live humans driving the machine. Of course, the speech today was loony tunes, and they really are human shaped turd monsters, but we should all be paying attention....because it looks as though they've check mated those of us who were still harboring hope for a more moderate and civilized approach to reasonable gun control we can all agree on.

So basically you want to see a thread that says exactly what you agree with... Scootaloo Dec 2012 #1
Maybe what the poster wants is more forward movement? Baitball Blogger Dec 2012 #3
This is exactly what i'm talking about. nt NashvilleLefty Dec 2012 #5
Really? Scootaloo Dec 2012 #6
Maybe you should see my other posts on the same subject NashvilleLefty Dec 2012 #8
I think there's a lot of serious discussion going on.. even here, among those DUers Voice for Peace Dec 2012 #26
The families of the victims of recent shootings are all in touch with each applegrove Dec 2012 #2
All we are getting is raquel69 Dec 2012 #4
The children shall lead them... NashvilleLefty Dec 2012 #9
(insert hyperbolic, polarizing response) (nt) Posteritatis Dec 2012 #7
LOL! NashvilleLefty Dec 2012 #10
All right. I'm an optomist too. You want a REAL discussion? yewberry Dec 2012 #11
yup Skittles Dec 2012 #12
How's this for real?... FUCK GUNS world wide wally Dec 2012 #13
There is no mention Jenoch Dec 2012 #27
The more pointless name calling that is thrown back and forth along with talking point rhetoric... OneTenthofOnePercent Dec 2012 #14
Skeptical rbennettucm Dec 2012 #15
Serious? Okay, since you ask... Demo_Chris Dec 2012 #16
I'd say that was seriously paranoid! socialindependocrat Dec 2012 #17
It may have been a little over the top in the statement... daleanime Dec 2012 #18
He's talking about a small group of people on the right (mostly) socialindependocrat Dec 2012 #19
Yes, it was over the top, but I wanted to make a critical point Demo_Chris Dec 2012 #22
Thanks for your reply - Agreed - Wer're on the same page socialindependocrat Dec 2012 #24
Thank you! I need to work on my writing style, toning things down. (nt) Demo_Chris Dec 2012 #25
When a "right" is abused... then the people should have a right to limit that right... Comrade_McKenzie Dec 2012 #20
You SHOULD have a problem with this Demo_Chris Dec 2012 #23
A serious discussion starts with the fact that we live in the most peaceful era of human history Taitertots Dec 2012 #21
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»I'd really like to see a ...»Reply #15