Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

justiceischeap

(14,040 posts)
67. I think it was noticed by my inattention to things.
Mon Jan 23, 2012, 07:59 AM
Jan 2012

When asked why I wasn't paying attention, I told them I was bored with "little kid" books. Then they asked what I was reading and I told them. It was a few grades later that I was tested and sent to a school for the gifted & talented (didn't stay there long, didn't fit in with the other kids and was miserable). I don't remember what kind of test I took, I'm 40ish now, so that was a while back. I think they may have given me several different books from advanced grades to see if I could read and comprehend them.

I do know that my mom was ALWAYS reading to me as a small child and my favorite books were The Wind and the Willows and Stuart Little. My mom read me those instead of typical books for small children. I also had a great-grandmother who worked on my reading levels in kindergarten/1st grade by making me read out loud from the KJV bible.

This is outrageous alcibiades_mystery Jan 2012 #1
That's probably a district policy proud2BlibKansan Jan 2012 #7
both boys way above their grade level in reading. 4 or more years above. they were always encouraged seabeyond Jan 2012 #23
I never got the whole "not allowed to read above the grade level" thing Posteritatis Jan 2012 #28
As was I, in the sixties. My mom had some rather pointed words with one of my gkhouston Jan 2012 #38
Thanks to my school system's stellar budgeting, checking out stuff above my level wasn't a problem Posteritatis Jan 2012 #39
The thought is to obey authority. Sirveri Jan 2012 #46
"you will obey them or be punished" Trillo Jan 2012 #75
My second grade teacher in Florence, KY was named Miss Ockerman OriginalGeek Jan 2012 #77
Not so frequent. Igel Jan 2012 #42
Yes, this. boppers Jan 2012 #49
That's moronic XemaSab Jan 2012 #62
That's ghastly! Such a policy is new to me. JackRiddler Jan 2012 #61
Yeah, that's the part that made me really angry also. distantearlywarning Jan 2012 #74
What a bunch of elitist crap! justiceischeap Jan 2012 #2
By the time I was in 3rd grade I was reading at 12th grade level. My teachers, kestrel91316 Jan 2012 #22
I was the same way EvolveOrConvolve Jan 2012 #31
that's no big deal. At the age of 5 I was reading double-PhD material. provis99 Jan 2012 #55
I made it all the way to 24th grade! jberryhill Jan 2012 #59
Do you remember how they determined what grade level you were at? Prometheus Bound Jan 2012 #64
I think it was noticed by my inattention to things. justiceischeap Jan 2012 #67
What a terrible shame.. To take something annabanana Jan 2012 #3
I can't comment on the story, but I think it's a great question. Donald Ian Rankin Jan 2012 #71
I read it as "Tikki-eyed Mista", sub-consciously inserting the missing hyphen. Trillo Jan 2012 #4
Me too -- and I'm naming my new rock band Atman Jan 2012 #41
Same here. Actually, the whole tiger story sounds like gibberish. yardwork Jan 2012 #44
Oh, idioms like that pop up all over the place Occulus Jan 2012 #54
As I'm a much slower reader than probably 99% of y'all, kentauros Jan 2012 #45
Copy/paste thing boppers Jan 2012 #52
As I said, kentauros Jan 2012 #56
Always skim the questions before reading the essay jberryhill Jan 2012 #60
Shows what happens when someone writes questions on something they know nothing about n2doc Jan 2012 #5
These Are Typical Standardized Test Questions Yavin4 Jan 2012 #13
No, this is a great question. Donald Ian Rankin Jan 2012 #70
What a stupid question. Kalidurga Jan 2012 #6
yes Rosa Luxemburg Jan 2012 #8
No. Donald Ian Rankin Jan 2012 #72
There is no such thing as a perfect score on a standardized test proud2BlibKansan Jan 2012 #9
No, it's a great question. Donald Ian Rankin Jan 2012 #69
i m a teacher and i see poorly worded test questions all the time arely staircase Jan 2012 #10
My Third Grader grntuscarora Jan 2012 #11
WHy is it about tigers anything? Betsy Ross Jan 2012 #12
Me, too, because tigers don't talk. Fawke Em Jan 2012 #18
exactly Marnie Jan 2012 #21
grubs used to be a normal part of the typical human diet eShirl Jan 2012 #66
Thanks for saying it..... Curmudgeoness Jan 2012 #19
Reading in context is everything. boppers Jan 2012 #47
I wonder how that teacher would react to my kids who read two books at once riderinthestorm Jan 2012 #14
Some of this could be due to TPTB wanting children to watch TV Trillo Jan 2012 #15
K&R Solly Mack Jan 2012 #16
They gave up after the first question? Prometheus Bound Jan 2012 #17
I've worked with both practice and real tests at every grade level from K through 6. proud2BlibKansan Jan 2012 #20
I've come to believe that the PURPOSE of these tests is to make children hate learning Lydia Leftcoast Jan 2012 #25
I really don't want to believe that proud2BlibKansan Jan 2012 #34
Charles Dickens eerily foretold what we could expect in "Hard Times" coalition_unwilling Jan 2012 #53
The problem with all sort answer tests is that the person taking the test has to be Marnie Jan 2012 #26
These types of questions test understanding of the text, not knowledge. Prometheus Bound Jan 2012 #63
The right answer is Tiggers like to bounce! Loudmxr Jan 2012 #24
k&r Starry Messenger Jan 2012 #27
my son took an all day test last week. he was telling me about the story and question seabeyond Jan 2012 #29
wouldn't something like this lead to black/white thinking ? JI7 Jan 2012 #30
Hopefully. Donald Ian Rankin Jan 2012 #79
That's an excellent question, and the right answer is c), of course. Donald Ian Rankin Jan 2012 #32
That's my first choice proud2BlibKansan Jan 2012 #35
I looked at my kid's science test. Igel Jan 2012 #43
I got C too. I learned to do well on tests, because, well, my brain functions oddly. boppers Jan 2012 #48
Your one is a classic fallacy Donald Ian Rankin Jan 2012 #51
There was no discussion of the positions when each was dropped. Only the height and time. boppers Jan 2012 #57
Here's my version derby378 Jan 2012 #33
E proud2BlibKansan Jan 2012 #36
I would like to read more stories from your "Newt is fucked" series. JBoy Jan 2012 #40
BEST post I've seen in a very long time! davsand Jan 2012 #58
Aw, shucks... derby378 Jan 2012 #78
I've run into this same nonsense when going over homework with my kids. redqueen Jan 2012 #37
There is an opt out movement proud2BlibKansan Jan 2012 #50
This one is a perfectly good question, not nonsense at all! Donald Ian Rankin Jan 2012 #68
I wasn't actually referring to this example... redqueen Jan 2012 #76
Interesting breakdown of responses to this malthaussen Jan 2012 #65
"What did the tigers do together" is pointless banality. What was the story *really* about is not. ieoeja Jan 2012 #73
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»What happened when 3 PhDs...»Reply #67