Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

LudwigPastorius

(12,903 posts)

8. Could have been a coincidence, but North Korea pulled out of the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty two months...

Reply to Jack Valentino (Reply #6)

Sun Jun 22, 2025, 02:48 AM

Jun 22

before the U.S. invaded Iraq.

Or, maybe it wasn't a coincidence. Maybe Kim Jong Il saw the buildup to the invasion and figured hammer down on his nuclear program was the only chance for his country's survival.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

10 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

The nuclear risk of going to war with Iran [View all] LudwigPastorius Jun 21 OP

I've been over worrying about getting nuked since I screwed my knees up diving under desks Silent Type Jun 22 #1

Judging from observed behavior, blackmail is more effective than nuclear weapons in bullying the US with Trump. usonian Jun 22 #5

This message was self-deleted by its author PeaceWave Jun 22 #2

I think it's been obvious for awhile that only nukes can deter an attack. Crunchy Frog Jun 22 #3

Worry about the response should Israel be hit hard and at risk. PufPuf23 Jun 22 #4

Yes, the "Samson option"---- Jack Valentino Jun 22 #7

The main reason Iran may have desired to create atomic weapons, if they did desire that, Jack Valentino Jun 22 #6

Could have been a coincidence, but North Korea pulled out of the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty two months... LudwigPastorius Jun 22 #8

Also Iran has allies that have nuclear weapons and could just give them one or join on their behalf. meadowlander Jun 22 #9

His conclusion is flawed Mosby Jun 22 #10