Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Showing Original Post only (View all)'No recovery from this': Grand Teton National Park advocates sound alarm bells [View all]
Last edited Fri Jun 20, 2025, 09:29 PM - Edit history (1)
https://www.sfgate.com/national-parks/article/grand-teton-national-park-land-sale-alarm-bells-20383751.phpNATIONAL PARKS
'No recovery from this': Grand Teton National Park advocates sound alarm bells over possible sell-off
A GOP bill puts public lands for sale. Its effects on Grand Teton National Park could be irreversible.
By Kylie Mohr,
Big Sky Country Contributing Parks Editor
June 20, 2025
Senate Republicans recently proposed the sale of up to 3.29 million acres of public land across 11 Western states. While Grand Teton National Park and other national parks themselves arent on the chopping block, large swaths of national forest and Bureau of Land Management lands could potentially be sold and developed.
The Wilderness Society analyzed the reconciliation bills limitations and then released a map showing the more than 258 million acres eligible for sale if Senate Republicans proposal is included in President Donald Trumps tax bill.
That includes much of the national forests that surround Grand Teton National Park: the Bridger-Teton National Forest on the east side of Jackson Hole and the Caribou-Targhee National Forest, which directly borders the western side of the Tetons.
..more..
32 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

'No recovery from this': Grand Teton National Park advocates sound alarm bells [View all]
G_j
Jun 20
OP
It's a good thing that Idaho didn't vote for that Smart Lady because she would have protected National Parks. 😑
Bread and Circuses
Jun 20
#13
It's ridiculous that it's even possible/legal to fucking SELL national parks/public lands in this country.
Karasu
Jun 20
#2
I cannot state in graphic detail the images that are playing out in my mind right now.
NBachers
Jun 20
#6
The dishonesty. Nobody voted for this. Trump and the GOP want to push this through without voters noticing. Democratic
Doodley
Jun 20
#7