Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

pipoman

(16,038 posts)
26. I agree with all of this..
Thu Dec 20, 2012, 10:31 AM
Dec 2012

and also wonder if at least some violence perpetrated by people with mental illness isn't a reaction to pharmaceuticals and not a symptom of their disorder at all.

The snippet you posted is wrong. randome Dec 2012 #1
Maybe would be if a good share of rampage shooters didn't turn out pipoman Dec 2012 #2
70% of murders are by guns BainsBane Dec 2012 #12
Why not both? Arcana Dec 2012 #13
I'm fine with that BainsBane Dec 2012 #17
But scapegoating legal gun owners is perfectly acceptable hack89 Dec 2012 #27
no one is scapegoating gun owners BainsBane Dec 2012 #29
So all those OPs equating gun ownership with mental illness hack89 Dec 2012 #30
Did I write them? BainsBane Dec 2012 #31
Just pointing out the mood of DU hack89 Dec 2012 #32
. . . BainsBane Dec 2012 #34
Democrats own guns hack89 Dec 2012 #35
what point was that? BainsBane Dec 2012 #36
I am certainly will to consider reforms hack89 Dec 2012 #37
So the majority of these rampage killings aren't also pipoman Dec 2012 #14
A fraction of murders BainsBane Dec 2012 #16
... pipoman Dec 2012 #25
Another point BainsBane Dec 2012 #18
I agree with all of this.. pipoman Dec 2012 #26
That mass murder of people of color is utterly ignored Fire Walk With Me Dec 2012 #3
The constant war tama Dec 2012 #4
Some of us have nadinbrzezinski Dec 2012 #6
Some black Connecticut residents question media attention on Newtown shootings FarCenter Dec 2012 #11
It's a problem "white america" may not be interested in addressing, much less solving. Fire Walk With Me Dec 2012 #42
Nope, not one bit nadinbrzezinski Dec 2012 #5
Yes, of course it is. H2O Man Dec 2012 #7
So the majority of these guys aren't mentally ill? pipoman Dec 2012 #9
Which guys? H2O Man Dec 2012 #10
Rampage killers. pipoman Dec 2012 #15
"Rampage killers" is a H2O Man Dec 2012 #28
In the case of Jared Loughner, James Holmes, and Seung-Hui Cho, weren't they just expelled and Arcana Dec 2012 #38
Don't you understand... pipoman Dec 2012 #40
I understand. H2O Man Dec 2012 #41
There has been borderline conceptual discussion of it here in GD, in poll form etc. Fire Walk With Me Dec 2012 #43
I think that would be ridiculous pipoman Dec 2012 #49
You lost me at "PETA vegan is outrageous." Didn't bother to read the rest. nt Honeycombe8 Dec 2012 #8
How could anyone possibly think this creates stigma? Denninmi Dec 2012 #19
there's some big brother shit being suggested fizzgig Dec 2012 #21
Yup, my exact thought. Denninmi Dec 2012 #22
When advocates and activists say "Let's have the conversation" I think they prefer more level-headed Arcana Dec 2012 #23
It's a little hard not to take it personally Denninmi Dec 2012 #24
I understand Arcana Dec 2012 #39
it does when it calls for a broadbrush abrogation of our rights fizzgig Dec 2012 #20
I am opposed to mentally ill people with potentially violent tendencies having firearms el_bryanto Dec 2012 #33
Perhaps because such is being stated in broad brush strokes without real knowledge of mental illness Fire Walk With Me Dec 2012 #44
There's nothing controversial about that, but that's not REALLY the nature of the concern. HereSince1628 Dec 2012 #45
"mentally ill people with violent tendencies" loyalsister Dec 2012 #46
Spot on! Fire Walk With Me Dec 2012 #48
Yes, it's stigmatising Spider Jerusalem Dec 2012 #47
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Is having the conversatio...»Reply #26