There are serious constitutional issues with charging fees to exercise enumerated civil rights/liberties.
no, there aren't
Antonin Scalia: 2008
Like most rights, the right secured by the Second Amendment is not unlimited...nothing in our opinion should be taken to cast doubt on longstanding prohibitions on the possession of firearms by felons and the mentally ill, or laws forbidding the carrying of firearms in sensitive places such as schools and government buildings, or laws imposing conditions and qualifications on the commercial sale of arms. We also recognize another important limitation on the right to keep and carry arms prohibiting the carrying of dangerous and unusual weapons.
A bit ambiguous..Sounds like some sort of government sponsored forum not open to gun rights activists, only gun control advocates..Yeah, that creates it's own constitutional issues.
no, it isn't and no it doesn't
its not ambiguous at all - it says the NRA has too much influence, not really debatable.
'for citizens' means EVERYBODY, government sponsored so the govt. is forced to participate.
ideally, more reasonable people from both sides would participate, and narrow minded fools would be too embarassed to yap their BS
it doesn't create any "constitutional issues", is the freakin' site the thing is posted on "unconstitutional"?
some of the pro-gun petitions on the white house's own site are kind of awful, really.
you are the one who seems to be confused about "constitutional issues", in the end