Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Quit criticizing the President! This deal could have been a lot worse. [View all]kenny blankenship
(15,689 posts)44. The BASE let him down, with all their whining!
If they didn't scream in pain when he floats a proposed cut to this or that market-hostile Big Government program, he wouldn't feel obliged to give these concessions to the Republicans so freely. Then after the deed is done, the drama ponies pout and say they're not going to vote anymore. Well what can he do but try to appeal to more Republicans if that's the way the Democratic Base is going to behave?
It's all THEIR fault.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
98 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
The OP is fundamentally deluded about this: "we should all support the President on all issues"
leveymg
Dec 2012
#46
We have a lot of myopic folks here on this issue. I think we will be better off for our leaders'
Hoyt
Dec 2012
#50
You do realize that changes to SS don't have to be negotiated as part of the "Cliff"?
leveymg
Dec 2012
#71
Hey, it could have been a lot worse. They could have voted in death squads to kill all your loved
EOTE
Dec 2012
#84
Will 2014 help bring a Democratic House if they touch SS & seniors stay home in disgust? n/t
Little Star
Dec 2012
#78
SS benefits are first on the chopping block. What's next? Because something in your list will be.
forestpath
Dec 2012
#4
How's that Ralph Nader thingydingy from 2000 doing from the same type of idiotic protest?
graham4anything
Dec 2012
#54
That's right. And per Carney, "technical adjustments ... is one sought by Republicans."
WorseBeforeBetter
Dec 2012
#10
Don't know where you've been, but so far the 21st century has been pretty doomey. n/t
Egalitarian Thug
Dec 2012
#93
You're asking too much. Reason is in short supply 'round these parts.
Liberal_Stalwart71
Dec 2012
#22
Thanks for putting it out there. Now Obama will offer up jus primae noctis in his next round
RomneyLies
Dec 2012
#25
There might be a difference in that "jus primae noctis" refers to the right of the lord to have the
AnotherMcIntosh
Dec 2012
#63
Ultimately some seniors will have to do with less.... I work with seniors, sir, and
plethoro
Dec 2012
#30
Yeah, I can only imagine the horror of January. If we don't hit the streets, we may
plethoro
Dec 2012
#76
"Aren't we supposed to support the President's positions on all the issues?" LOL
reformist2
Dec 2012
#37
"supposed to support the Democratic President's positions on ALL the issues?"
MattBaggins
Dec 2012
#56
You know, there are a lot of people who don't immediately recognize and appreciate sarcasm.
AnotherMcIntosh
Dec 2012
#58
I think he has a will of steel, very smart, and is masterful at leading folks even where they don't
TheKentuckian
Dec 2012
#97
Aren't we supposed to support the Democratic President's positions on all the issues? NO.
CaliforniaPeggy
Dec 2012
#77
Good one, dawg! Too bad so many here are satire/irony impaired (as we like to say the Freepers are)
kath
Dec 2012
#81
From Bad, too Worse, too Worse Yet, too 'hey, it's all Groovy!' (A too B too C too D)
mrdmk
Dec 2012
#82
I survive (not "live") at 50% of the poverty cut-off income amount via SS. If he touches it at all,
Fire Walk With Me
Dec 2012
#98