Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

PCIntern

(27,332 posts)
3. Yes. I'm not saying
Sun Apr 27, 2025, 11:34 AM
Apr 27

That recent advances are faulty… What I’m saying is that this was taught to us as irrevocable science and that we were obliged to follow this without fail or we were absolutely remiss in our responsibility to the patient. Later research may show that this is better outcome, but no mention is ever made of the fact that prior to the alteration in the protocol, The treatment modality was quite frankly problematic. When we were instructed in those days, nobody allowed as to how this could be the case. It was “do this or the patient dies because you didn’t do it right“.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»I find this mildly intere...»Reply #3