Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

unblock

(55,251 posts)
2. As to the cpr point,
Sun Apr 27, 2025, 11:03 AM
Apr 27

Former ent here. Not sure, but I rather suspect, the change was based not on any medical improvement, but rather, based on educational improvement.

The idea being that the previous (and likely, more medically beneficial) approach was too complicated, so that *in practice*, what rescuers did was a less-than-ideal mess.

The simpler teaching may have been a step down in theory, but an improvement in practice as they were easier for rescuers to remember and implement when the time came.

Again, this is semi-informed speculation based on vague recollections of conversations either former colleagues and an article or two I once read, all years ago. I'll readily admit my recollection could be faulty.

Recommendations

4 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»I find this mildly intere...»Reply #2