Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

nadinbrzezinski

(154,021 posts)
10. Yup
Tue Dec 18, 2012, 07:57 PM
Dec 2012
http://www.democraticunderground.com/10022024223

Just to add another layer to the uniquely American problem. Moreover, the problem with the second is not that it is archaic, but purposeful bad interpretation. Dependent clauses are not the strong part of the RW who luuuve s then guns.

If we actually interpreted as needed, ther be universal conscription of owners of infantry rifles, that's what they are. But history and grammar ain't their strong point.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Ten-country comparison su...»Reply #10