Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Showing Original Post only (View all)Billionaires Jack Dorsey and Elon Musk Call To Eliminate Intellectual Property Rights for Creators [View all]
As artists fight to protect their works from being used to train AI models, Jack Dorsey wants to eliminate intellectual property (IP) laws altogether. Elon Musk agrees.
On Friday, the cofounder of X (then Twitter) and Block (then Square) posted on X, "delete all IP law." Elon Musk, the current leader of X, chimed in to comment, "I agree."
-snip-
Dorsey, Musk, and Altman's words underscore a common belief amongst tech entrepreneurs that copyright laws need to evolve to account for the potential of generative AI. Already, both OpenAI and Google have openly lobbied the U.S. government to allow AI models to train on protected works such as movies, articles, and music. They want such use to fall under the fair use legal doctrine, with OpenAI calling it a matter of "national security."
-snip-
"Intellectual property law is rooted in the U.S. Constitution as a tool to promote creativity, not suppress it. It ensures that those who contribute to cultural and scientific progress are recognized, protected, and compensated," said Atreya Mathur, director of Legal Research at the Center for Art Law, in an email to Mashable. "Elimination of such laws would ignore that very purpose and devalue the labor and rights of creators, including those whose work powers these technologies."
On Friday, the cofounder of X (then Twitter) and Block (then Square) posted on X, "delete all IP law." Elon Musk, the current leader of X, chimed in to comment, "I agree."
-snip-
Dorsey, Musk, and Altman's words underscore a common belief amongst tech entrepreneurs that copyright laws need to evolve to account for the potential of generative AI. Already, both OpenAI and Google have openly lobbied the U.S. government to allow AI models to train on protected works such as movies, articles, and music. They want such use to fall under the fair use legal doctrine, with OpenAI calling it a matter of "national security."
-snip-
"Intellectual property law is rooted in the U.S. Constitution as a tool to promote creativity, not suppress it. It ensures that those who contribute to cultural and scientific progress are recognized, protected, and compensated," said Atreya Mathur, director of Legal Research at the Center for Art Law, in an email to Mashable. "Elimination of such laws would ignore that very purpose and devalue the labor and rights of creators, including those whose work powers these technologies."
More here: https://mashable.com/article/jack-dorsey-elon-musk-ip-laws-artists-react
___________________________________________________________________________________
Billionaires are parasites, feeding off of the work of others and undermining our Democracy with their obscene wealth.
Tax them out of existence!
62 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

Billionaires Jack Dorsey and Elon Musk Call To Eliminate Intellectual Property Rights for Creators [View all]
LudwigPastorius
Apr 15
OP
Their goal is to make it easier for them to steal the creative innovations of others.
John1956PA
Apr 15
#1
Definitely an excellent plan to destroy any incentive for creativity and innnovation.
Trueblue Texan
Apr 15
#51
Mickey Mouse is in the public domain since January of last year after being copyrighted for 95 years.
Dave Bowman
Apr 15
#39
Only the early, Steamboat Willie version of Mickey Mouse is in the public domain.
generalbetrayus
Apr 15
#45
Yup...muskrat has done it all his life. Buy something, claim he designed it and when it comes time for fresh
PortTack
Apr 15
#27
I guess it'd be OK until someone stole a valuable piece of intellectual property from them.
patphil
Apr 15
#20
Mucus et al make intellectual property but theirs is protected as trade secrets. They don't have to publish it.
Bernardo de La Paz
Apr 15
#23
FUCK that. Instead, regulate the fuck out of AI. The continued lack of federal legislation is fucking absurd.
Karasu
Apr 15
#24
I wish. But there's no putting the genie back in the bottle now thanks to all these billionaire fucks forcing it on us
Karasu
Apr 15
#55
That's communism for intellectual property. Software is intellectual property.
bucolic_frolic
Apr 15
#29
They should lead by example and give up rights for x.xom, twitter, and bluesky
Renew Deal
Apr 15
#34
We want to use your intelectual property for our profit. See, that's how it's supposed to work. Get with the program ...
aggiesal
Apr 15
#37
Gov. Pritzker vetoes bill that would have required llinois warehouse workers to know their quotas
Passages
Apr 15
#47
As someone whose family has been involved in copyright law for 1,500 years
markodochartaigh
Apr 15
#48