Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Yes, we need the 2nd amendment. [View all]graham4anything
(11,464 posts)2. Get a bow and arrow. Nobody but Federal/state/local law enforcement need a gun.
10% of something is better than nothing
but to assure no guns in the street, all guns need to be 100% out of the street, and any still found need to be taken care of.
Guns can stay in the home but not outside
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
80 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Get a bow and arrow. Nobody but Federal/state/local law enforcement need a gun.
graham4anything
Dec 2012
#2
if you read what I wrote- you can keep your gun in the home NOT IN THE STREET
graham4anything
Dec 2012
#8
hunters can use bow and arrows, that is what the native americans used before they were killed
graham4anything
Dec 2012
#35
Exactly. How will he unlock his gun from the safe where it is supposed to be without alerting the
stevenleser
Dec 2012
#49
Does that include when you are asleep? Or on the othe side of the house? Or on the john?
stevenleser
Dec 2012
#75
I agree. As I recall, on your own property you have the right to most any method of protection.
libdem4life
Dec 2012
#7
I think I can understand the mentality of believing in a need to be armed against the government
Voice for Peace
Dec 2012
#21
I think one of the chapters in my Foxfire books is devoted to this very thing.
leftofcool
Dec 2012
#78
If we ban the second amedment, how to you plan on taking the guns from the criminals?
darkangel218
Dec 2012
#51
"Remove the legal guns, and the supply of illegal guns is greatly reduced"
darkangel218
Dec 2012
#61
A muzzle loading flintlock would suffice for what he described and did for quite some time
Major Nikon
Dec 2012
#26
Because it is easier to conceal a handgun and sneak it into a public place like a school? (nt)
Nye Bevan
Dec 2012
#53
You are promoting the concept that there's a massive conspiracy to ban all guns
Major Nikon
Dec 2012
#72
I wonder, how those folks managed to keep from starving back in the late 1700's.
Savannahmann
Dec 2012
#58
I know lots of people who would otherwise not be able to feed their families if they didn't hunt,
MadHound
Dec 2012
#66
"There are a lot of people who donate their venison to the poor." paraphrased again
Whovian
Dec 2012
#69