Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

pat_k

(11,417 posts)
21. While the points may be true, I think that to 47 it is simpler than that.
Thu Apr 3, 2025, 09:12 PM
Apr 2025

Last edited Thu Apr 3, 2025, 10:12 PM - Edit history (2)

Yes, 47 undoubtedly recognizes his tariffs can be leveraged to bring the powerful to heel, but I don't think that is what is driving his obsession with them.

47 is simpleminded. Taxing great wealth and income to benefit the common weal is an affront to him. His obsession with tax cuts is driving his obsession with tariffs. To him, tariffs represent massive federal revenue. That's all. He has no vision of using tariffs as economic policy. He just sees dollar signs. He views the federal government coffers as the president’s personal piggy bank from which he can dole out benefits to those he sees as peers (other rich guys). That's it. He doesn't care what it does to the economy. In his head, any loss in GDP is just being sucked into the federal coffers. Then it's "his" money to hand out in massive tax cuts for the wealthy.

The worthwhile people (those with great wealth) must keep “their” money (never mind they couldn’t make that money without the support of the public sector, educated workforce, infrastructure, and on and on). No one and nothing else matters.

In his pea brain, the fact his tariffs probably represent the most massive and regressive tax increase in history is a feature, not a bug.

I think he has the same view toward the so-called "savings" from decimating the executive branch. Never mind that the operations of executive agencies represent a very small fraction of the federal budget (don't know who coined it, but from a budgetary perspective, the U.S. government is basically an insurance company with an army). He doesn't care. He sees dollar signs. It’s “his” money and he is absolutely confident “his” Congress with go along with whatever he wants to do with it.

Recommendations

7 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Pump and dump enid602 Apr 2025 #1
Or tank stocks to buy them cheaply. Chemical Bill Apr 2025 #17
Trump is using the tariffs to get control of the US. Irish_Dem Apr 2025 #2
Great analysis by Sen Murphy. + reminder of our power nt delisen Apr 2025 #3
Get thee to the greatest page malaise Apr 2025 #4
Congress could undo ALL of this tomorrow if they chose to. Scrivener7 Apr 2025 #5
If only we had a Legislative branch in government! n/t leftstreet Apr 2025 #24
Mike Johnson is blocking it flamingdem Apr 2025 #34
"every industry or company will need to pledge loyalty to Trump"." Australians were talking about this yesterday Demovictory9 Apr 2025 #6
The Aussies also told him to fuck off PortTack Apr 2025 #42
That is 100% correct, and once the game is public knowledge bucolic_frolic Apr 2025 #7
Where is the something being done and where can i see it? Terry_M Apr 2025 #10
As I see it, we are stuck with Trump for four years. Lonestarblue Apr 2025 #40
Vance will not be worse-- he doesn't control the cult. But otherwise it is all terrible, especially the loss of science LymphocyteLover Apr 2025 #45
I see this as key birdographer Apr 2025 #50
This is really good interpretation.... hlthe2b Apr 2025 #8
Murphy gets it. dem4decades Apr 2025 #9
Yep ibegurpard Apr 2025 #11
Really Good Analysis CitizenZero Apr 2025 #12
thanks for this stillcool Apr 2025 #13
Hear the people sing Gray Champion Apr 2025 #14
Welcome to DU LetMyPeopleVote Apr 2025 #49
I like how he referenced the revolutionary times crud Apr 2025 #15
Great Post! Thank You!!! MayReasonRule Apr 2025 #16
This is critical information. Concise, to the point, and easily understood by everyone (well, almost everyone). wordstroken Apr 2025 #18
Absolutely correct. He is trying to cause as much damage as possible relayerbob Apr 2025 #19
Small businesses will KT2000 Apr 2025 #20
While the points may be true, I think that to 47 it is simpler than that. pat_k Apr 2025 #21
I would love to know how involved he is babylonsister Apr 2025 #25
Krugman had a similar, if more straightforward, analysis. Martin68 Apr 2025 #22
Just went to Bluesky and read the thread.. Diabolical.. Trump isn't smart enough to figure this out Joinfortmill Apr 2025 #23
A keeper for sure! calimary Apr 2025 #26
And an even scarier possibility about his rise to 'absolute power'... LaRaven Apr 2025 #27
Shock Doctrine by Naomi Klein retread Apr 2025 #28
Good Book CitizenZero Apr 2025 #29
K&R n/t Alice Kramden Apr 2025 #30
He wants the world leaders on their Figarosmom Apr 2025 #31
Most if not all will not go along. China, Canada, Australia and all of the EU other than Trkiye and Hungary are nos PortTack Apr 2025 #43
Baron von Trumphausen WhatTheFlux Apr 2025 #32
KNR and bokmarking. niyad Apr 2025 #33
Kick and rec LiberalLovinLug Apr 2025 #35
Simply, that thing in the White House is attacking us. Six117 Apr 2025 #36
My senator is getting lots of good press lately...dare I hope he aspires to higher office? CTyankee Apr 2025 #37
Kick for the morning crows n/t malaise Apr 2025 #38
EXACTLY. Tariffs are EXTORTION. Martin Eden Apr 2025 #39
K&R WestMichRad Apr 2025 #41
His Point #4 is ahistoric. malthaussen Apr 2025 #44
I think history is full of examples of rulers using taxation as a punishment LymphocyteLover Apr 2025 #47
I think this is possible but the problem I see is that how many entities affected will really be able to negotiate with LymphocyteLover Apr 2025 #46
I'm really digging Murphy these days, but... returnee Apr 2025 #48
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»11 Bluesky texts from Sen...»Reply #21