Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Here's a firearms compromise I've often thought of (involves a lot of give from both sides) [View all]Egalitarian Thug
(12,448 posts)32. Fine with me except that everybody you want to stop will just ignore it. n/t
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
58 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Here's a firearms compromise I've often thought of (involves a lot of give from both sides) [View all]
sir pball
Dec 2012
OP
I'd prefer limit of two non-semi-autos, little public carrying, regular psychological evaluation,.
Hoyt
Dec 2012
#27
I think that is what society is trying to do with respect to guns, along with preventing massacres,
Hoyt
Dec 2012
#51
I disagree. If one wants/needs one of those things, it's evidence they have some issue.
Hoyt
Dec 2012
#57
You would have to hire another 100,000 BATF clerks or investigators , what ever you want to call
former-republican
Dec 2012
#29
Fine with me except that everybody you want to stop will just ignore it. n/t
Egalitarian Thug
Dec 2012
#32
None of this will stop a criminal but it creates an investigate tool for after the fact
former-republican
Dec 2012
#33