Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

bigtree

(91,779 posts)

4. as she explains, she doesn't have a complete record before her

Reply to dchill (Reply #1)

Wed Feb 19, 2025, 06:04 PM

Feb 19

...to address the scattershot of Trump actions in the 14 complaints to make an immediate stay.

She doesn't have enough material evidence in front of her from the plaintiffs about specific cases of imminent harm that can't be reversed later, which is what the law requires to make that ruling, yet.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

19 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Despite Chutkan denying states request for an immediate restraint, she says their "larger case against Musk is strong" [View all] bigtree Feb 19 OP

At what "juncture," then? dchill Feb 19 #1

We are, but we have to demonstrate harm to have standing Qutzupalotl Feb 19 #2

as she explains, she doesn't have a complete record before her bigtree Feb 19 #4

So, soon then? Or maybe later - when we have more time. dchill Feb 19 #5

the plaintiffs will ask for a preliminary hearing, different from this emergency one bigtree Feb 19 #7

As a layperson, this seems analogous to--or worse than--stalker cases. spooky3 Feb 19 #3

she's pointing out that she is likely to rule against Musk on status grounds, as well bigtree Feb 19 #6

But isn't it true that Musk can remedy this simply by getting spooky3 Feb 19 #8

i know nothing about the laws, but i would think Musk could be sued big time class action suit, because he bluestarone Feb 19 #9

can he get republican approval? bigtree Feb 19 #10

They approved Gabbard, RFK Jr., and others with spooky3 Feb 19 #11

Musk's closet is a mess bigtree Feb 19 #12

To Trump that's not disqualifying. Look at RFK's background. spooky3 Feb 19 #14

oh yes, what Trump or republicans want or will do bigtree Feb 19 #15

Please tell the hacks at M$Greedia malaise Feb 19 #13

Eh, at this juncture... Hugin Feb 19 #16

I'm more concerned here at DU with advocacy bigtree Feb 19 #18

we're allies NJCher Feb 20 #19

The answer is simple. WarGamer Feb 19 #17