Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

Showing Original Post only (View all)

bigtree

(91,797 posts)
Wed Feb 19, 2025, 05:52 PM Feb 2025

Despite Chutkan denying states request for an immediate restraint, she says their "larger case against Musk is strong" [View all]

Congresswoman Jasmine Crockett @RepJasmine
The Rapid Response team is here to break down what Judge Chutkan’s Ruling meant… while also learning that according to Trump… ELON is just a lap dog with no power 🤯.

I need the names of the people doing the firings and shutting the money off, then…





___Judge Chutkan said that the states hadn’t shown “that they will suffer imminent, irreparable harm absent a temporary restraining order.”

But the judge also indicated she was skeptical about the Trump administration’s statements about Musk and his powers in DOGE...

“The court is aware that DOGE’s unpredictable actions have resulted in considerable uncertainty and confusion for Plaintiffs and many of their agencies and residents,” she wrote in the 10-page ruling. “It remains ‘uncertain’ when and how the catalog of state programs that Plaintiffs identify will suffer.”


Chutkan went on to say that even though the states’ larger case against Musk is “strong,” their arguments at this stage in the litigation were not good enough to satisfy the standard that must be met to warrant emergency action by the court.

A fiery footnote from Chutkan highlighted seeming contradictions between those assertions and Trump’s executive orders creating DOGE, which connected DOGE to agency personnel decisions.

“Defense counsel is reminded of their duty to make truthful representations to the court,” she wrote.



https://www.cnn.com/2025/02/18/politics/doge-temporary-restraining-order-chutkan/index.html

___Though she stopped short of issuing the restraining order, Chutkan wrote that she thought the plaintiffs have raised a “colorable Appointments Clause claim with serious implications,” noting that Musk hasn’t been nominated by Trump or confirmed by the Senate, which is required for officers who exercise significant governmental authority.

“Musk has rapidly taken steps to fundamentally reshape the Executive Branch,” Chutkan wrote. Yet she also noted that “even a strong merits argument cannot secure a temporary restraining order at this juncture.”

The key phrase there being “at this juncture.”

So while the plaintiffs failed to win temporary relief, they might succeed later in this litigation and secure a more lasting victory against what Chutkan acknowledged is the billionaire’s bid to fundamentally reshape the government.

https://www.msn.com/en-ca/news/politics/how-elon-musk-and-doge-s-temporary-win-from-judge-chutkan-could-turn-into-a-loss/ar-AA1znFqH
19 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
At what "juncture," then? dchill Feb 2025 #1
We are, but we have to demonstrate harm to have standing Qutzupalotl Feb 2025 #2
as she explains, she doesn't have a complete record before her bigtree Feb 2025 #4
So, soon then? Or maybe later - when we have more time. dchill Feb 2025 #5
the plaintiffs will ask for a preliminary hearing, different from this emergency one bigtree Feb 2025 #7
As a layperson, this seems analogous to--or worse than--stalker cases. spooky3 Feb 2025 #3
she's pointing out that she is likely to rule against Musk on status grounds, as well bigtree Feb 2025 #6
But isn't it true that Musk can remedy this simply by getting spooky3 Feb 2025 #8
i know nothing about the laws, but i would think Musk could be sued big time class action suit, because he bluestarone Feb 2025 #9
can he get republican approval? bigtree Feb 2025 #10
They approved Gabbard, RFK Jr., and others with spooky3 Feb 2025 #11
Musk's closet is a mess bigtree Feb 2025 #12
To Trump that's not disqualifying. Look at RFK's background. spooky3 Feb 2025 #14
oh yes, what Trump or republicans want or will do bigtree Feb 2025 #15
Please tell the hacks at M$Greedia malaise Feb 2025 #13
Eh, at this juncture... Hugin Feb 2025 #16
I'm more concerned here at DU with advocacy bigtree Feb 2025 #18
we're allies NJCher Feb 2025 #19
The answer is simple. WarGamer Feb 2025 #17
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Despite Chutkan denying s...