Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Showing Original Post only (View all)Despite Chutkan denying states request for an immediate restraint, she says their "larger case against Musk is strong" [View all]
Congresswoman Jasmine Crockett @RepJasmineThe Rapid Response team is here to break down what Judge Chutkans Ruling meant while also learning that according to Trump ELON is just a lap dog with no power 🤯.
I need the names of the people doing the firings and shutting the money off, then
Link to tweet
___Judge Chutkan said that the states hadnt shown that they will suffer imminent, irreparable harm absent a temporary restraining order.
But the judge also indicated she was skeptical about the Trump administrations statements about Musk and his powers in DOGE...
The court is aware that DOGEs unpredictable actions have resulted in considerable uncertainty and confusion for Plaintiffs and many of their agencies and residents, she wrote in the 10-page ruling. It remains uncertain when and how the catalog of state programs that Plaintiffs identify will suffer.
Chutkan went on to say that even though the states larger case against Musk is strong, their arguments at this stage in the litigation were not good enough to satisfy the standard that must be met to warrant emergency action by the court.
A fiery footnote from Chutkan highlighted seeming contradictions between those assertions and Trumps executive orders creating DOGE, which connected DOGE to agency personnel decisions.
Defense counsel is reminded of their duty to make truthful representations to the court, she wrote.

https://www.cnn.com/2025/02/18/politics/doge-temporary-restraining-order-chutkan/index.html
___Though she stopped short of issuing the restraining order, Chutkan wrote that she thought the plaintiffs have raised a colorable Appointments Clause claim with serious implications, noting that Musk hasnt been nominated by Trump or confirmed by the Senate, which is required for officers who exercise significant governmental authority.
Musk has rapidly taken steps to fundamentally reshape the Executive Branch, Chutkan wrote. Yet she also noted that even a strong merits argument cannot secure a temporary restraining order at this juncture.
The key phrase there being at this juncture.
So while the plaintiffs failed to win temporary relief, they might succeed later in this litigation and secure a more lasting victory against what Chutkan acknowledged is the billionaires bid to fundamentally reshape the government.
https://www.msn.com/en-ca/news/politics/how-elon-musk-and-doge-s-temporary-win-from-judge-chutkan-could-turn-into-a-loss/ar-AA1znFqH
19 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

Despite Chutkan denying states request for an immediate restraint, she says their "larger case against Musk is strong" [View all]
bigtree
Feb 2025
OP
the plaintiffs will ask for a preliminary hearing, different from this emergency one
bigtree
Feb 2025
#7
she's pointing out that she is likely to rule against Musk on status grounds, as well
bigtree
Feb 2025
#6