Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Here we go again. Now it's supposedly about child pornography. [View all]sabrina 1
(62,325 posts)44. Not if they are among your top five campaign contributers:
http://www.opensecrets.org/politicians/summary.php?cid=N00026106
I know that under the current system, they have little choice but to take money from corporations. That amount is what she has received SO FAR for the 2012 campaign.
If you want to see who gets the most from the Music/Movie industry, here is a list together with their votes, until the blackout and public pressure forced them to rethink that bill.
The largest amounts go to people on the Dem side, like Schumer, Reid, Boxer (big disappointment) Leahy (another big disappointment) and all were ready to vote 'yes' on that bill.
http://projects.propublica.org/sopa/pipa#roll_call
It's beyond blaming them, the longer they are in DC the more they accept how things work there. The problem is the system and that is what must be changed or the people will never be truly represented.
Shorter election seasons would be a start.
It's doubtful, eg, if many of them even knew what it was about. I have read that they are told by the Lobbyists what to think about a particular bill and that they view them as 'experts' so take their word most of the time. The public has little input into this system unless the outrage is so great, they have to listen.
Top 5 Industries, 2011-2012, Campaign Cmte
Industry Total Indivs PACs
Lawyers/Law Firms $101,369 $72,369 $29,000
Public Sector Unions $75,000 $ 0
Real Estate $70,676 $55,676 $15,000
Health Professionals $63,000 $24,000 $39,000
TV/Movies/Music $55,000 $13,500 $41,500
Industry Total Indivs PACs
Lawyers/Law Firms $101,369 $72,369 $29,000
Public Sector Unions $75,000 $ 0
Real Estate $70,676 $55,676 $15,000
Health Professionals $63,000 $24,000 $39,000
TV/Movies/Music $55,000 $13,500 $41,500
I know that under the current system, they have little choice but to take money from corporations. That amount is what she has received SO FAR for the 2012 campaign.
If you want to see who gets the most from the Music/Movie industry, here is a list together with their votes, until the blackout and public pressure forced them to rethink that bill.
The largest amounts go to people on the Dem side, like Schumer, Reid, Boxer (big disappointment) Leahy (another big disappointment) and all were ready to vote 'yes' on that bill.
http://projects.propublica.org/sopa/pipa#roll_call
It's beyond blaming them, the longer they are in DC the more they accept how things work there. The problem is the system and that is what must be changed or the people will never be truly represented.
Shorter election seasons would be a start.
It's doubtful, eg, if many of them even knew what it was about. I have read that they are told by the Lobbyists what to think about a particular bill and that they view them as 'experts' so take their word most of the time. The public has little input into this system unless the outrage is so great, they have to listen.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
69 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Here we go again. Now it's supposedly about child pornography. [View all]
woo me with science
Jan 2012
OP
Nobody? Factually false, which is tragic considering the indefensible crimes and that
proverbialwisdom
Jan 2012
#57
I understand that you are confused and think these bills are actually about
Warren Stupidity
Jan 2012
#61
Wrong, wrong, wrong! Wasserman-Schultz's work on this issue cannot be legitimately critiqued.
proverbialwisdom
Jan 2012
#8
Fair points. Thanks for acknowledging there's a massive unresolved problem due to underfunding.
proverbialwisdom
Jan 2012
#60
Yeah, I don't think anyone would be opposed to a bill SOLELY to increase law enforcement funding.
LAGC
Jan 2012
#62
Don't slime PROTECT.ORG when you don't have any supporting facts and don't know their views on this.
proverbialwisdom
Jan 2012
#45
I guess folks haven't noticed how many of these predators are in elected office :-(
Leopolds Ghost
Jan 2012
#49
Incorrect, if you go to the link for the first article - SOPA sponsor has another Internet bill that
quinnox
Jan 2012
#15
The lobbying has never stopped. I cannot remember which show but there is a pro-SOPA ad on one
jwirr
Jan 2012
#36
Hell, that would work out well as an excuse for a round of corporate welfare.
TheKentuckian
Jan 2012
#54