Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

In reply to the discussion: Mentally ill people.. [View all]
 

John2

(2,730 posts)
18. Just what
Sat Dec 15, 2012, 10:05 AM
Dec 2012

did she think, she was going to do with two hand guns,one semi-automatic rifle and hundreds of rounds of ammunition? Her son also wore a bullet proof vest. She also had a job of teaching 5-10 year old kids. What kinda of woman would go around armed like fort knox? She must have had a violent view of things her self. Who did she plan to use those weapons on. I would like to know just what she expected to do with those weapons. I don't accept her mindset. And how do we know her son didn't get his views of the world from her, even if he was mentally disturbed? It seems to me, that he had no sense about preserving life. If his mother espoused her views of resorting to violence, then why not her son? It is just the idea, she had the intent of using those weapons on someoneelse because of her paranoia about other people.

The bottomline is I'm a veteran, and never needed to purchase a weapon in my life, because I have not needed one in this country. The less, you resort to guns, the less likely you are to get killed. When people have the ability to bring a gun into the situation, then the likely hood of losing your life heightens. And I have been in violent situations before, but no gun was present. Once you bring guns into the situation, then the other person is likely to get a gun. What gun lobbyists are advocating is an arms race.

Mentally ill people.. [View all] rainlillie Dec 2012 OP
I think you have touched on the heart of the problem. kentuck Dec 2012 #1
The woman who bought the guns in this incident was not mentally ill. Honeycombe8 Dec 2012 #50
How do you know she was not mentally ill? marshall Dec 2012 #67
Exactly. There has been no indication she had mental illness. nt Honeycombe8 Dec 2012 #71
And thus none that she did not marshall Dec 2012 #80
Presumption of innocence. I presume you are sane, since there is no evidence you are not. Honeycombe8 Dec 2012 #120
Reports are now looking like the mother had her own inner demons marshall Dec 2012 #119
I'll look for those. So far I've read accounts of her by friends in the neighborhood... Honeycombe8 Dec 2012 #121
I worry about statements like "signs of mental illness" hfojvt Dec 2012 #91
Medication, therapy, counseling, etc. should be free and confidential for all ck4829 Dec 2012 #2
A good mental health care system is going to be extremely expensive Fumesucker Dec 2012 #3
Corporate Profits Come Easier When Based On Fear Than Compassion And Assistance cantbeserious Dec 2012 #5
And treatment requires trained professionals and expensive medications. beac Dec 2012 #43
Bingo! n/t Helen Reddy Dec 2012 #69
Everybody suffers with that one ck4829 Dec 2012 #6
Sadly, you are right. nt raccoon Dec 2012 #40
You're right. October Dec 2012 #77
Yes, yes, yes! nt snappyturtle Dec 2012 #4
Yes, indeed. KarenS Dec 2012 #7
I can't understand why Lanza's mother would keep all those guns in the house when valerief Dec 2012 #8
I'm going to take a wild leap here and speculate that she thought she had secured them adequately slackmaster Dec 2012 #11
Just what John2 Dec 2012 #18
There is no information here that indicates that she was going around armed, or that the vest... slackmaster Dec 2012 #19
Maybe you heard John2 Dec 2012 #45
I'm sorry John2, you seem confused. It's well established that the guns belonged to her. slackmaster Dec 2012 #51
And now we John2 Dec 2012 #72
I just heard that too. I've taught many people to shoot, but I know a few people who I would not... slackmaster Dec 2012 #74
Now you, John2 Dec 2012 #83
Thanks for the kind word John2. I regard myself as a "white hat" gun owner. slackmaster Dec 2012 #94
Seeing as how she was liberalmike27 Dec 2012 #75
Thank you. Very well said. My dad and granddad were both veterans as well, mbperrin Dec 2012 #100
He wasn't a child. llmart Dec 2012 #65
This message was self-deleted by its author slackmaster Dec 2012 #66
Excellent point. In_The_Wind Dec 2012 #12
So you John2 Dec 2012 #23
I think ~ she didn't think In_The_Wind Dec 2012 #28
Now you, John2 Dec 2012 #62
According to some accounts, she took him to the firing range quite regularly where they both mbperrin Dec 2012 #99
I don't understand why these people don't leave such weapons AT THE FIRING RANGE. valerief Dec 2012 #111
Because for too many, these guns are parts of their identity, their very bodies. mbperrin Dec 2012 #112
Why can't they just have a simple foot fetish instead of a gun fetish if they need a damn fetish? valerief Dec 2012 #113
Absolutely! mbperrin Dec 2012 #122
Cut out medicaid or medicare and see what happens. kitt6 Dec 2012 #9
Imho, this issue has three legs Sienna86 Dec 2012 #10
This country has regressed when it comes to mental health. juajen Dec 2012 #13
It's almost like a third rail issue. no_hypocrisy Dec 2012 #14
Another good point you bring up Sienna86 Dec 2012 #15
That exactly was the case in my example. no_hypocrisy Dec 2012 #17
What would social services do for him? Temp housing in a shelter? bettyellen Dec 2012 #49
Ideally lifelong commitment to a facility like when a criminal is adjudicated no_hypocrisy Dec 2012 #59
I don't think they commit anyone "life long" until after a heinous criminal act- the usual is to bettyellen Dec 2012 #81
And that's the problem. no_hypocrisy Dec 2012 #82
parents have no options except to kick them out. it's sick. bettyellen Dec 2012 #84
From what I have heard - the mother owned the guns. Apparently they were easilly accessible. geckosfeet Dec 2012 #16
Yep! Mentally Ill people and guns — not a good mix brush Dec 2012 #20
agree with your viewpoints northoftheborder Dec 2012 #78
how about everybody gets to have the guns that were current at the time of the 2nd amendment renate Dec 2012 #115
..and can only express themselves using 18th C. technology. friendly_iconoclast Dec 2012 #116
Agreed brush Dec 2012 #117
I have had it with this mass bigotry in defense of your precious guns BainsBane Dec 2012 #21
I think an act of mass murder is ipso facto proof that a person has some form of mental illness slackmaster Dec 2012 #22
Let's not talk symptoms cause you won't like where that goes. Pholus Dec 2012 #27
Or maybe an indication of a strenthening economy slackmaster Dec 2012 #33
Oh yes, that was the reason.... Pholus Dec 2012 #87
I don't dispute that there are some paranoid people who buy guns for weird reasons out there slackmaster Dec 2012 #95
Post removed Post removed Dec 2012 #104
I think you John2 Dec 2012 #31
Thank you for that fine example of authentic frontier gibberish slackmaster Dec 2012 #34
He was a violent murderer BainsBane Dec 2012 #38
Now you are suggesting that the killer's mother, a victim, was mentally ill because she owned guns slackmaster Dec 2012 #42
good god BainsBane Dec 2012 #53
I would have wanted you... Helen Reddy Dec 2012 #76
Thanks! nt BainsBane Dec 2012 #106
Post removed Post removed Dec 2012 #32
Your hero Reagan closed down the loony bins BainsBane Dec 2012 #47
Thank you, well said! n/t Helen Reddy Dec 2012 #73
Thank you. Jamastiene Dec 2012 #85
Stop Teaching Gun Violence! Maineman Dec 2012 #24
Unfortunately for your thesis jeff47 Dec 2012 #107
Lack of access to good mental health care susanr516 Dec 2012 #25
Great... 99Forever Dec 2012 #26
My solution is very simple. I keep all firearms securely locked up in a big, sturdy safe. slackmaster Dec 2012 #29
Wonderful. 99Forever Dec 2012 #36
I would support a federal law mandating safe storage slackmaster Dec 2012 #37
It isn't you or your methods that worry me. 99Forever Dec 2012 #52
Good luck getting the legislatures of 38 states to buy in on that one slackmaster Dec 2012 #55
So we just let the murdering scum win? 99Forever Dec 2012 #58
I presented a rational, sane, realistic, workable idea here, and you've attempted to trash it slackmaster Dec 2012 #60
No, you didn't. 99Forever Dec 2012 #68
So, you don't think a madatory safe storage law is a good idea? slackmaster Dec 2012 #70
Don't put words in my mouth... 99Forever Dec 2012 #79
I'm trying to determine why you denied that I presented a constructive idea slackmaster Dec 2012 #97
Mandatory safe storage is a good idea, but how many can afford an expensive safe? kwassa Dec 2012 #101
That's why I think there should be some kind of tax incentive for people who buy robust safes slackmaster Dec 2012 #102
Guns are already denied based on income jeff47 Dec 2012 #108
I guess I'll never get that shoulder-fired rocket, then. kwassa Dec 2012 #109
No, that's banned by several laws. jeff47 Dec 2012 #118
it's begining to look SemperEadem Dec 2012 #30
Yes, I do agree` silhouete2 Dec 2012 #35
I would probably be defined as 'mentally ill.' Are_grits_groceries Dec 2012 #39
You have made a good decision. I know several people with depression who have done the same. slackmaster Dec 2012 #44
The problem is diagnosing the illness. Most mentally ill persons show no outward signs. My brother jwirr Dec 2012 #41
I think indications are that the murderer in this case was in fact diagnosed with a personality... slackmaster Dec 2012 #46
And his mother still bought the guns for him? I wonder what her diagnosis was? jwirr Dec 2012 #48
Circular reasoning, and not very good slackmaster Dec 2012 #54
I heard that they were all registered in her name - The Ed Show. jwirr Dec 2012 #61
Yes, they were registered in her name because they belonged to her slackmaster Dec 2012 #63
the problem is getting treatment before violence happens. bettyellen Dec 2012 #56
That's a very big problem, and people generally have a right to refuse treatment slackmaster Dec 2012 #57
yes. and treatment is inadequate at best. bettyellen Dec 2012 #88
This message was self-deleted by its author slackmaster Dec 2012 #96
as have I. when you see such ignorance about it here, it gets easier to understand bettyellen Dec 2012 #98
Are you saying you advocate forcing mentally ill people to carry special ID cards Jamastiene Dec 2012 #93
I did not say that and I would not. I was pointing out that there is not way to identify anyone jwirr Dec 2012 #105
Some insurance, if not all of them mecherosegarden Dec 2012 #64
Reagan threw them all out of the institutions onto the street. Insurance won't pay, or I Dustlawyer Dec 2012 #86
I take it you think all mentally ill people are violent and all mass shooters Jamastiene Dec 2012 #89
You can take it that way, but you'd be wrong! rainlillie Dec 2012 #114
some years ago (the 70's) we went with community options dembotoz Dec 2012 #90
Unfortunately, the AMA is raising all copays/coinsurance on the most fragile cbdo2007 Dec 2012 #92
Fuck that. Zoeisright Dec 2012 #103
mentally ill covers a large spectrum. someone with anxiety disorder or ADHD probably not shooting up dionysus Dec 2012 #110
The people in GD who are making these absolutist, draconian, ignorant decistions for all Fire Walk With Me Dec 2012 #123
Yes, this sort of thing can be obtained legally: Warren DeMontague Dec 2012 #124
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Mentally ill people..»Reply #18