Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Dems need to dump neo-liberal economics [View all]qazplm135
(7,578 posts)5. Every election
The left or right, when they lose, asserts that they lost for not being pure enough left or right.
Which is almost never true... because of the public were yearning for far left or far right, then they wouldn't vote for the party furthest away from that.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
4 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
61 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Nixon coined the phrase "supply side economics" mocking these mostly Orange County Republicans
underpants
Nov 29
#28
So they elected someone who will destroy everything for everyone. Yeah, that makers sense. Not.
onecaliberal
Nov 29
#3
And we're gonna hand it all over to them knowing they're going to take a sledge hammer to it.
CrispyQ
Nov 29
#32
I am beginning to wonder if articles from the Guardian belong in the Creative Speculation Group. nt
taxi
Nov 29
#4
A bit harsh - the author is a former Chief Economist at the World Bank, and a winner of the Nobel Prize for Economics
muriel_volestrangler
Nov 29
#17
Bill is a lot like Donald in a lot of ways. Women, and the trend to adlib on stage for hours and the belief that they
LiberalArkie
Nov 29
#20
And they both appear to be the same in theory at least. Neither one seems to be in favor of "The Great Society"
LiberalArkie
Nov 29
#22
You may be right, but if so, we better figure out how to enjoy losing more. New leaders/advisors are needed...
dutch777
Nov 29
#33
Insult for Democrats ("money in politics" ) but Democrats aren't and won't ever be socialists.
betsuni
Nov 29
#11
Yes, absolutely. Can't afford eggs. I still just SMH at this statement. And, I only get eggs a couple of times every
SWBTATTReg
Nov 29
#52
When you only buy like 2 dozen eggs over six months like I do, no particular reason why, they are not expensive.
SWBTATTReg
Nov 29
#54
I buy a lot of them because my husband is diabetic and we use eggs for his morning protein. Egg whites as well.
onecaliberal
Nov 29
#55
The word socialist is so thoroughly intertwined with Russian misery and breadlines and oppression
summer_in_TX
Nov 30
#60
So what is the alternative? What should Clinton and Obama have done? (Real question).
LAS14
Nov 29
#47