Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
The US government admits purposely aiming bombs at children. woo me with science Dec 2012 #1
"Some Afghan kids aren’t bystanders" cpwm17 Dec 2012 #4
No one has seen Obama's kill list, even your name could be there. nt jody Dec 2012 #2
Why are those claims mutually exclusive? dmallind Dec 2012 #3
That about covers it. ManiacJoe Dec 2012 #5
No one in the world thinks that the US would not kill women and children sabrina 1 Dec 2012 #13
If you are going to use a nonstandard definition of innocent, ManiacJoe Dec 2012 #14
Iraq ... explain what standard was used to kill all those Iraqis. sabrina 1 Dec 2012 #18
What kind of question is that? cpwm17 Dec 2012 #32
Thank you for that nonstandard definition. ManiacJoe Dec 2012 #33
Everyone that we murder in our unprovoked wars is innocent cpwm17 Dec 2012 #34
hate to break it to you.... ShadesOfBlue Dec 2012 #43
Sticking your fingers in your ears and saying la-la-la does not stop the practice of human shields. dmallind Dec 2012 #17
Why do you think that non-Americans have so little regard for their children sabrina 1 Dec 2012 #20
Are you missing my very simple words? What fucking reason do you have to imply that? dmallind Dec 2012 #35
I watched the video twice, and I could not tell what was going on in the sabrina 1 Dec 2012 #44
I totally fucking agree with you! lunatica Dec 2012 #25
Thanks, and I absolutely agree with your last sentence. If I had my way, sabrina 1 Dec 2012 #38
Do you have me on ignore? lunatica Dec 2012 #36
No, I don't have anyone on ignore! sabrina 1 Dec 2012 #37
thanks! lunatica Dec 2012 #39
If I did, you would definitely not be one of them, as I like you too! sabrina 1 Dec 2012 #40
That is one of the best, coherent explanations of the situation .... oldhippie Dec 2012 #22
I think you've covered it...there are no totally safe options. nt. OldDem2012 Dec 2012 #30
Yep. It's easy to soundbiteize The Rules but stuff like this is actually complicated. (nt) Posteritatis Dec 2012 #41
american presidents can kill anyone they want, thanks. your concern is noted :-) nt msongs Dec 2012 #6
There's a thought experiment that asks cpwm17 Dec 2012 #7
One can only be so accurate with 500 or 1000 pound bombs. quaker bill Dec 2012 #8
They're also usually cheaper to buy & use. Angleae Dec 2012 #9
Yes, but in general quaker bill Dec 2012 #11
Becasue the missiles are armed with high explosive warheads? Kaleva Dec 2012 #10
because we hate children. HiPointDem Dec 2012 #12
Because the terrorists use human shields (nt) Nye Bevan Dec 2012 #15
You mean they have families? Is that you, Bibi? Comrade Grumpy Dec 2012 #19
Yes. And possibly. AnotherMcIntosh Dec 2012 #27
Could you post some evidence of that? And since they know killing children sabrina 1 Dec 2012 #21
No, terrorists bomb humans cpwm17 Dec 2012 #31
I would like to know why but agree with other posters who point out that bombs are worse. randome Dec 2012 #16
Have you read any of the reports by Robert Fisk and other war correspondents sabrina 1 Dec 2012 #23
I agree they're 'evil' insofar as anyone can define that term. randome Dec 2012 #24
Well the missiles are accurate. It's the people who are deciding to launch the missiles at... Poll_Blind Dec 2012 #26
Physics... as expressed in the expansion of energetic gasses hit children. Agnosticsherbet Dec 2012 #28
For those on this thread that like drones, here's good news for you. AnotherMcIntosh Dec 2012 #29
Don't care for drones quaker bill Dec 2012 #45
As long as there's no oversight & no consequences, this atrocity will get worse. DirkGently Dec 2012 #42
If there was oversight and consequences, "shock and awe" would have been prosecuted first. quaker bill Dec 2012 #46
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»If Our Drones Are So Accu...»Reply #37