Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

fwm

(12 posts)
28. Check the Vermont listing of current legislature.
Mon Dec 10, 2012, 06:29 PM
Dec 2012

You will find that his name is no where to be found.

This isn't from the Onion? marmar Dec 2012 #1
So this could be thought of as a sort of private mandate, yes? Fumesucker Dec 2012 #2
LOL - Great Point! /eom dballance Dec 2012 #13
The Bill then also identifies all gun owners. JoePhilly Dec 2012 #3
D'oh!!! sadbear Dec 2012 #7
That's some powerful, relentless logic you used there JoePhilly slackmaster Dec 2012 #19
Cannot be constitutional still_one Dec 2012 #4
that was my first thought too justabob Dec 2012 #8
This reads like bullshit from the gun lobby madokie Dec 2012 #39
Being fined if you don't purchase a private product is unconstitutional? Fumesucker Dec 2012 #15
Are the Tea Baggers going to scream and cry and sue about this MANDATE? /nt Drale Dec 2012 #5
I lived in Kennesaw when they passed the law auburngrad82 Dec 2012 #6
was the Kennesaw law challenged? justabob Dec 2012 #9
The Kennesaw law had a conscientious objector clause slackmaster Dec 2012 #20
thanks justabob Dec 2012 #25
Some news articles I read state that the Kennesaw law was amended in response petronius Dec 2012 #44
Ever been to Kennesaw, GA? Whovian Dec 2012 #10
Yes, I lived there for 5 years. RebelOne Dec 2012 #22
Interesting bongbong Dec 2012 #37
Klan memorabilia, all white, and pro-Confederate: sounds like an "RKBA" paradise. apocalypsehow Dec 2012 #23
... SammyWinstonJack Dec 2012 #11
Other than the logic lies, the article is fine bongbong Dec 2012 #12
Yep. But they keep peddling that palpably bogus line. Good post. apocalypsehow Dec 2012 #24
We burnt our bras jehop61 Dec 2012 #14
File this one under "Idiotic laws" Glad I don't have this guy representing me. AnOhioan Dec 2012 #16
More symbolic and meant to dope slap anti-gun crusaders... -..__... Dec 2012 #17
so you support requiring ownership of firearms and oppose restriction of them? CreekDog Dec 2012 #45
Whatever led you to belive that? -..__... Dec 2012 #46
you support a law requiring ownership to prove a point CreekDog Dec 2012 #48
Reading comprehnsion isn't one of your strong points... -..__... Dec 2012 #49
Next they'll throw you in jail Turbineguy Dec 2012 #18
This Better Be Defeated Dirty Socialist Dec 2012 #21
It has exactly no chance whatsofuckingever cali Dec 2012 #31
What is going to be oh so sweet, and it's looking more & more like it'll happen in my lifetime, apocalypsehow Dec 2012 #26
He's a two-term Republican legislator. According to Maslack.... Little Star Dec 2012 #27
Sounds like a real piece of work. n/t. apocalypsehow Dec 2012 #30
Surely, the government of Vermont already knows ... surrealAmerican Dec 2012 #43
Check the Vermont listing of current legislature. fwm Dec 2012 #28
you know where this is going? No where. Dems have a supermajority in both houses. cali Dec 2012 #29
Wait!? This is happening in VERMONT!? PennsylvaniaMatt Dec 2012 #32
No. It's not happening. It didn't happen. It was some idiot trying to make some point cali Dec 2012 #34
Oh...I didn't know it was years ago...Didn't read the whole thing PennsylvaniaMatt Dec 2012 #35
Maybe that's why VT is one of 3 States... -..__... Dec 2012 #36
huh? what are you trying to say? cali Dec 2012 #38
That the Liberal legislature of VT... -..__... Dec 2012 #41
In VT anyone who can legally own a gun can carry concealed Marrah_G Dec 2012 #47
this is from 2001. I doubt the bill even made anywhere near a vote. cali Dec 2012 #33
Stupid law. justanidea Dec 2012 #40
Nice RW blog you're reading there: muriel_volestrangler Dec 2012 #42
Locking REP Dec 2012 #50
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Vermont bill would fine c...»Reply #28