Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
43. Eating THC butter has a different and more intense effect than smoking it. I don't recomend it to..
Sun Dec 9, 2012, 04:49 PM
Dec 2012

anyone because an unsuspecting person will not function well. If you smoke to much then you become slow and dumb. Eat to much and the world starts spinning and nothing makes sense.

I agree riverbendviewgal Dec 2012 #1
Morons. MineralMan Dec 2012 #2
That was an astonishingly stupid thing to do. annabanana Dec 2012 #3
That was stupid. morningfog Dec 2012 #4
what it has to do with the new laws: Voice for Peace Dec 2012 #91
This has happened before the "new laws" morningfog Dec 2012 #99
Wow - NOT funny. Ruby the Liberal Dec 2012 #5
Yep...what Ruby said. BlueJazz Dec 2012 #6
How is it any different to spiking the punch? morningfog Dec 2012 #9
30 years from now, you can gladly make that analogy. Ruby the Liberal Dec 2012 #11
3 people went to the hospital, but only because they were unfamiliar with the effects of THC. morningfog Dec 2012 #13
Ah - I misread that. Ruby the Liberal Dec 2012 #19
No doubt, CO and WA will be under a microscope. morningfog Dec 2012 #24
Yes, there was actual danger. pnwmom Dec 2012 #22
I don't know what shootings you are talking about. morningfog Dec 2012 #26
Not irrelevant PADemD Dec 2012 #57
Wrong. The professor blacked out, according to the University. pnwmom Dec 2012 #139
She didn't black out. She wasn't driving. No one was hurt. morningfog Dec 2012 #146
I don't understand how you can say that. The head of the history department said she "blacked out." pnwmom Dec 2012 #151
I would concur PatrynXX Dec 2012 #58
there is an actual danger Enrique Dec 2012 #32
Eating THC butter has a different and more intense effect than smoking it. I don't recomend it to.. crazy homeless guy Dec 2012 #43
Any drug can be a danger to someone. You are giving a drug to someone Honeycombe8 Dec 2012 #64
cannabis is not a depressant shanti Dec 2012 #180
Yes, it is. "Depressant" doesn't mean it causes depression. It's a downer drug.... Honeycombe8 Dec 2012 #193
Actually... Buddyblazon Dec 2012 #196
Yes there is an actual danger. Putting a substance in my body that I am SWTORFanatic Dec 2012 #69
because unknowingly ingesting it, would make them think they were suddenly sick -in the head bettyellen Dec 2012 #86
It's fodder for the Prohibition Trolls. Jackpine Radical Dec 2012 #88
It would be just as wrong to spike punch and not tell people. pnwmom Dec 2012 #14
Thank you. Ruby the Liberal Dec 2012 #15
I agree. And it would also be punishable by law. morningfog Dec 2012 #20
No one is blaming legalization Ruby the Liberal Dec 2012 #23
YES. pnwmom Dec 2012 #25
Not if we are vigilant in knocking down this frame every time it is presented. morningfog Dec 2012 #28
You can not be present in everyone's living room jeff47 Dec 2012 #110
I am taking the opportunity here, which is the only place morningfog Dec 2012 #116
Patience. It will be used. Whether or not it's successfu is not something we can tell right now.nt jeff47 Dec 2012 #118
It won't be. CO and WA aren't going to be repealing legalization. morningfog Dec 2012 #119
And nobody thought the 18th amendment could be ratified in 5 years. They did it in 2. jeff47 Dec 2012 #122
How's that 18th Amendment working out now? morningfog Dec 2012 #124
And that's supposed to provide comfort how? jeff47 Dec 2012 #126
The Federal government could decide to pressure the state to enforce the law. pnwmom Dec 2012 #140
This has nothing to do with legalization. Do you support legalization? morningfog Dec 2012 #145
I don't buy it. But, even if it were, how they hell are you going to stop idiots from being idiots? morningfog Dec 2012 #27
You can't stop idiots from being idiots ToxMarz Dec 2012 #44
This has nothing to do with legalization. morningfog Dec 2012 #49
Yes, it has "nothing" to do with legalization. ... but, it will be used as a tool against RKP5637 Dec 2012 #56
Only by those who advance that argument. I am saying we should fight that. morningfog Dec 2012 #75
Agree!!! n/t RKP5637 Dec 2012 #82
At this point anything can have something to do with legalization. ToxMarz Dec 2012 #98
If it were illegal, would they have had the pot to begin with? Same argument as for guns? Honeycombe8 Dec 2012 #65
It has happened, many times in places where it is illegal. morningfog Dec 2012 #74
And so it is with guns, whether legal or illegal. So the use of guns is not connected with thecrimes Honeycombe8 Dec 2012 #90
It was illegal. The amendment has not been signed yet. morningfog Dec 2012 #125
Yep, it provides ammunition against pot, they will use it as a tool to say, see what happened in CO. RKP5637 Dec 2012 #55
Any time I've had "spiked" punch, it has been SheilaT Dec 2012 #62
It doesn't. I don't think the average person would know a pot brownie from kestrel91316 Dec 2012 #67
YOu can smell and taste pot in brownies too. morningfog Dec 2012 #76
if you wash the butter, or if you don't know what pot tastes like u don't. blaming the victims? bettyellen Dec 2012 #87
Blaming the victims is messed up. freshwest Dec 2012 #93
Calm down. That isn't what I said. morningfog Dec 2012 #105
you said the victims should have known. creepy! and I'm hella calm, but gee thanks for the concern! bettyellen Dec 2012 #120
Creepy? morningfog Dec 2012 #121
your statement was pretty emphatic, and I guess you are now saying.... pointless? bettyellen Dec 2012 #128
Whatever. morningfog Dec 2012 #129
The average person is likely not familiar with the smell and taste of pot. Dash87 Dec 2012 #103
not necessarily. uncle ray Dec 2012 #164
you would have no idea it's a pot brownie, the THC is dissolved in butter... second, dionysus Dec 2012 #94
Don't trust any "pot luck", there's way too many closet sickos to take the chance. xtraxritical Dec 2012 #37
Dudes! Not cool. I wouldn't underestimate the effects either. They were probably telling brewens Dec 2012 #7
I don't think they realized what happened to them till after pnwmom Dec 2012 #16
Only three went to the hospital. morningfog Dec 2012 #21
I wonder if those 3 who went to hospital ate multiple brownies? The article isn't clear. Electric Monk Dec 2012 #41
Could you please show me where I said it more than once? I corrected it where I was aware of it. pnwmom Dec 2012 #175
The others just felt kinda groovy. Mr.Bill Dec 2012 #79
"Only" three went to the hospital = 1/3 of those who consumed the brownies. pnwmom Dec 2012 #141
Repetition does not create truth from fiction. Three people to hospital, not 8. Bluenorthwest Dec 2012 #66
The first article I read said 8, but I corrected it to 3 when later articles said 3. pnwmom Dec 2012 #155
This is why we can't have nice things like other people have. NYC_SKP Dec 2012 #8
What they did is stupid, irresponsible and dangerous. Arkansas Granny Dec 2012 #10
sounds like bullshit to me Kali Dec 2012 #12
You think the professor was lying? The students? The hospital? nt pnwmom Dec 2012 #18
The framing is way ginned up in your presentation here. Consider how the new law Bluenorthwest Dec 2012 #73
You are putting words in my mouth. I said 3 went to the hospital and I never suggested that "the new pnwmom Dec 2012 #153
The smell of marijuana being smoked triggers a migraine for me undeterred Dec 2012 #17
The simple rules... alp227 Dec 2012 #60
Possible Cannabis Movement trolls. nt patrice Dec 2012 #29
You mean the OP who is trying to frame this as "an abuse of the new laws?" morningfog Dec 2012 #30
^This^ Warren Stupidity Dec 2012 #36
So how about this? randome Dec 2012 #63
No, that isn't even right. morningfog Dec 2012 #77
You don't think it possible that there is a struggle within that movement between patrice Dec 2012 #83
If You Slip Almost ANY Substance Into Someone's Food Or Drink, Without Their Knowledge... WillyT Dec 2012 #31
+1 also they could have been arrested for driving while impaired. For some that would mean loss of grantcart Dec 2012 #33
Great points about.. Cha Dec 2012 #35
Totally agree. Jennicut Dec 2012 #53
That is so not cool. Cha Dec 2012 #34
beyond dumb. spanone Dec 2012 #38
Amen, very dumb! treestar Dec 2012 #39
Disgusting behaviour. But hardly new; or specific to the time or place LeftishBrit Dec 2012 #40
The student may or may not have done it to celebrate the new law. pnwmom Dec 2012 #48
About 11,000 Americans die each year due to drunk drivers. 11,000 die and yet Bluenorthwest Dec 2012 #70
Who knows what would have happened if we had had the mass media pnwmom Dec 2012 #101
You are big on the marijuana boogey bandwagon. morningfog Dec 2012 #108
I think reefer madness is being thoughtless enough to feed marijuana pnwmom Dec 2012 #113
We agree it was thoughtless and stupid. morningfog Dec 2012 #117
I was a "yes" vote in here in Washington. pnwmom Dec 2012 #136
But, you do realize that legalization has not gone into effect in CO yet, right? morningfog Dec 2012 #148
Neither of us know whether this stupid act had anything to do with celebrating the new law. pnwmom Dec 2012 #149
You are the only one interjecting such an idea. The new law isn't even here yet. morningfog Dec 2012 #150
Dozens of people right here agree with me. As far as I can tell, you are one of very few pnwmom Dec 2012 #152
Do you realize the new law, legalization, has not even gone into effect yet? morningfog Dec 2012 #154
So? The point remains that people in these states should avoid doing stupid things pnwmom Dec 2012 #157
Thank you for finally acknowledging that this was unrelated to the new law morningfog Dec 2012 #159
I disagree. I think education can have an effect on people and help them avoid pnwmom Dec 2012 #173
Logic problem: This action wasn't legal under the new law or the old law. Romulox Dec 2012 #168
Thank you. This thread is absurd. morningfog Dec 2012 #188
Apparently Even People on DU are Not Grasping This On the Road Dec 2012 #100
Incidents like this have been happening for decades and are not a product of morningfog Dec 2012 #107
Except incidents like this did not get much coverage jeff47 Dec 2012 #111
You invented that motivation whole cloth. morningfog Dec 2012 #106
?? Why do you keep responding to pnwmom as though she is against legalization or hates pot? tblue37 Dec 2012 #134
You understood me correctly. pnwmom Dec 2012 #142
I'm not minimizing the danger. It was stupid, and they should be charged. morningfog Dec 2012 #156
New laws are in effect yet. She is inventing this strange celebration as motivation. morningfog Dec 2012 #147
Because this a classic case of "concern". THAT'S why. nt Romulox Dec 2012 #169
Dipwads. Hopefully they will learn something in school - besides this. geckosfeet Dec 2012 #42
One thing's for sure. They're gonna learn a few things in jail. nt Honeycombe8 Dec 2012 #68
This is why we can't have nice things. AtheistCrusader Dec 2012 #45
Right before final exams, real sharp kids bluestateguy Dec 2012 #46
No worries, I'm quite sure they'll be totally kicked out of school CanonRay Dec 2012 #47
This could have happened with or without the law. limpyhobbler Dec 2012 #50
It happened without the law. Legalization hasn't been signed into law yet in CO. morningfog Dec 2012 #127
Great way to further the cause, idiots. gateley Dec 2012 #51
This has happened before at my old High School in 2006 AldoLeopold Dec 2012 #52
This is sooo damn stupid and plays right into the critics hands. Damn fools!!! NOT funny at all. n/t RKP5637 Dec 2012 #54
These students are not as mature as the ones I went to school with in the 70s. They are hurting jwirr Dec 2012 #59
Students? LWolf Dec 2012 #61
Yes, but they were not being watched by the whole country to see how legalization was going to jwirr Dec 2012 #72
My mom's LWolf Dec 2012 #78
That's the stupidest thing I've heard in a while. defacto7 Dec 2012 #71
When I did loaded spaghetti for a dinner party Warpy Dec 2012 #80
We used to dose each other with LSD every once in a while. Hassin Bin Sober Dec 2012 #114
As a recovering alcoholic such a crime would create for me an unacceptable risk . . . Journeyman Dec 2012 #81
If someone pulled some shit like that with me Codeine Dec 2012 #84
When I eat pot-laced food, the effect is strong and lasts much longer than when I've smoked it. Drunken Irishman Dec 2012 #85
+1 dionysus Dec 2012 #95
I would being looking to press charges. Tien1985 Dec 2012 #89
Two killed at alleged Washington pot house on first day of legal weed Ruby the Liberal Dec 2012 #92
Absoluting disgusting. leftlibdem420 Dec 2012 #96
Ah... the value of today's college education. cherokeeprogressive Dec 2012 #97
*facepalm* Dash87 Dec 2012 #102
Felony charges? mokawanis Dec 2012 #104
Well, they could have quite easily killed someone jeff47 Dec 2012 #112
IT was stupid and an assualt. morningfog Dec 2012 #131
Some thyroid and heart medications, mostly. (nt) jeff47 Dec 2012 #132
Link? I've never heard that pot can cause death easily when mixed with anything. morningfog Dec 2012 #144
And you've probably never heard that, in susceptible people, it's been linked with arrhythmias. pnwmom Dec 2012 #158
Not minimizing. Just looking for accuracy. I have never heard of death from interaction. morningfog Dec 2012 #160
I just showed you about life-threatening arrhythmias. Obviously, if someone was taking pnwmom Dec 2012 #174
Be afraid of the reefer, it can kill you! morningfog Dec 2012 #185
Not hard to find.... jeff47 Dec 2012 #162
If you can't produce a link to show an interaction that causes death, just say so. morningfog Dec 2012 #163
430,000 results wasn't good enough for you? jeff47 Dec 2012 #165
430,000 results and not one saying there is a drug with which intraction easily causes a death. morningfog Dec 2012 #166
Why are the only interactions that matter ones that "easily cause death"? pnwmom Dec 2012 #176
Follow the discussion. morningfog Dec 2012 #179
Why? You can't. (nt) jeff47 Dec 2012 #183
Apparently you can't read. Because that list includes a lot of things that easily cause death. jeff47 Dec 2012 #182
Reefer Madness!!! morningfog Dec 2012 #184
Non sequiturs aren't a terribly good argument. jeff47 Dec 2012 #186
I'd like to have a moment of silence for all of those who have died due morningfog Dec 2012 #187
The University pointed out that the faculty member blacked out in her classroom. pnwmom Dec 2012 #138
It's assault with a friendly weapon. Hassin Bin Sober Dec 2012 #115
Bet these kids are wealthy Ashy Larry Dec 2012 #109
The "new law" has not even gone into effect in CO. morningfog Dec 2012 #123
To the jerks: Lady Freedom Returns Dec 2012 #130
1981 Kalidurga Dec 2012 #133
We always brought pot-laced cookies and brownies to school. Drunken Irishman Dec 2012 #135
Terrible prank Sassie Lassie Dec 2012 #137
Dosing someone with any mind altering substance could cause serious harm. Zorra Dec 2012 #143
What an awful, awful thing to do to people Aerows Dec 2012 #161
Assholes. No words for how wrong this is. CrispyQ Dec 2012 #167
Logic problem: This action wasn't legal under the new law or the old law. nt Romulox Dec 2012 #170
So? This is a reminder of the stupid things people can do pnwmom Dec 2012 #172
So your mention of the law is a complete non sequitur. But thanks for your concern. nt Romulox Dec 2012 #181
No, it's not. The media in WA and CO (do you live in one of those states) has ALREADY started pnwmom Dec 2012 #191
One more time: The new law has not gone into effect in CO. morningfog Dec 2012 #192
One more time: people in WA will hear the story and not ask whether the law in CO pnwmom Dec 2012 #194
I know you didn't ask that question. morningfog Dec 2012 #195
It's stupid and wrong, the same could be said if someone laced a beverage or punch Uncle Joe Dec 2012 #171
You're welcome, Uncle Joe. n/t pnwmom Dec 2012 #177
It is unfathomable that you would A) Waste that much pot on mostly strangers and B) cecilfirefox Dec 2012 #178
Definitely not cool, but was the hospital necessary? backscatter712 Dec 2012 #189
It just freaked them out, understandably. morningfog Dec 2012 #190
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Dumb, dumb, dumb pot pran...»Reply #43