Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: PoliticsGirl: There's nothing in the Constitution that says SCOTUS is the final word on what's constitutional [View all]RidinWithHarris
(790 posts)33. If that actually would work Congress could way too easily violate our constitutional rights
So, regardless of how much awfulness of the current SCOTUS I'd like to see reversed, I can't imagine that would fly as a way to do it. The downside of that power is extremely negative.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
46 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
PoliticsGirl: There's nothing in the Constitution that says SCOTUS is the final word on what's constitutional [View all]
Dennis Donovan
Sep 18
OP
If that actually would work Congress could way too easily violate our constitutional rights
RidinWithHarris
Sep 18
#33
Not me. That power would only require 267 of those 535 to want to fuck us over
RidinWithHarris
Sep 18
#36
Republicans will rush to embrace Shumer's No Kings (or Queens) Act after Kamala wins.
Marcuse
Sep 18
#7
This is what the criminal USSC6 fear most! They know they do not have the constitution on their side.
Clouds Passing
Sep 19
#43
My opinion is that the Fourth covers a woman's right to control her own body, thus abortion is her choice.
mucholderthandirt
Sep 19
#44