Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: PoliticsGirl: There's nothing in the Constitution that says SCOTUS is the final word on what's constitutional [View all]3825-87867
(1,113 posts)19. If members of SCOTUS are removed by "Official Act" as of now...
new members could change the rulings and congress could then pass a law no president is immune by law saving the discussion for future debates.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
46 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
PoliticsGirl: There's nothing in the Constitution that says SCOTUS is the final word on what's constitutional [View all]
Dennis Donovan
Sep 18
OP
If that actually would work Congress could way too easily violate our constitutional rights
RidinWithHarris
Sep 18
#33
Not me. That power would only require 267 of those 535 to want to fuck us over
RidinWithHarris
Sep 18
#36
Republicans will rush to embrace Shumer's No Kings (or Queens) Act after Kamala wins.
Marcuse
Sep 18
#7
This is what the criminal USSC6 fear most! They know they do not have the constitution on their side.
Clouds Passing
Sep 19
#43
My opinion is that the Fourth covers a woman's right to control her own body, thus abortion is her choice.
mucholderthandirt
Sep 19
#44