Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Showing Original Post only (View all)PoliticsGirl: There's nothing in the Constitution that says SCOTUS is the final word on what's constitutional [View all]
Link to tweet
PoliticsGirl
Theres nothing in the Constitution that says the Supreme Court is the final word on whats constitutional. They gave themselves that power with the Marbury v. Madison case in 1803. Maybe its time we re-litigate the precedent of judicial review Sam.
Theres nothing in the Constitution that says the Supreme Court is the final word on whats constitutional. They gave themselves that power with the Marbury v. Madison case in 1803. Maybe its time we re-litigate the precedent of judicial review Sam.
Captain Obvious️
Samuel Alito: Theres nothing in the Constitution that says a woman has the right to an abortion.
Well, theres nothing in the Constitution that says a former president has full immunity from prosecution.
🤔
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
46 replies, 6284 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (180)
ReplyReply to this post
46 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
PoliticsGirl: There's nothing in the Constitution that says SCOTUS is the final word on what's constitutional [View all]
Dennis Donovan
Sep 18
OP
If that actually would work Congress could way too easily violate our constitutional rights
RidinWithHarris
Sep 18
#33
Not me. That power would only require 267 of those 535 to want to fuck us over
RidinWithHarris
Sep 18
#36
Republicans will rush to embrace Shumer's No Kings (or Queens) Act after Kamala wins.
Marcuse
Sep 18
#7
This is what the criminal USSC6 fear most! They know they do not have the constitution on their side.
Clouds Passing
Sep 19
#43
My opinion is that the Fourth covers a woman's right to control her own body, thus abortion is her choice.
mucholderthandirt
Sep 19
#44