Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

Bantamfancier

(386 posts)

6. It was Joe.

Reply to teran (Reply #2)

Mon Sep 16, 2024, 12:23 PM

Sep 16

In 2020.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

56 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

For only the 2nd time in our 179-year history, editors of Scientific American are endorsing a candidate for president [View all] Dennis Donovan Sep 16 OP

K & R..................... Lovie777 Sep 16 #1

They laid out the evidence teran Sep 16 #2

It was Joe. Bantamfancier Sep 16 #6

Thanks! teran Sep 16 #37

Wow! Clouds Passing Sep 16 #3

Moved me to tears. Doodley Sep 16 #4

Me, too. 3catwoman3 Sep 16 #22

I hear you. Me, too. wordstroken Sep 16 #40

I'm so surprised! leftieNanner Sep 16 #5

I know, they also didn't choose johnnyfins Sep 16 #42

But, you know... leftieNanner Sep 16 #49

True johnnyfins Sep 16 #50

Well done. Magoo48 Sep 16 #7

Expect MAJOR boycott dweller Sep 16 #8

A boycott by both MAGAts that can read RainCaster Sep 16 #15

Perhaps a concept of science BattleRow Sep 16 #17

Not a problem North Coast Lawyer Sep 16 #19

Goes along with the xian evilgelicals who also only read fantasy - the bible. erronis Sep 16 #26

xian evilgelicals don't read either ancianita Sep 17 #56

Oh Guns&Ammo will reply with their big endorsement of the convicted felon. bluesbassman Sep 16 #27

MAGATS are already boycotting science mainer Sep 16 #28

Kick dalton99a Sep 16 #9

Kick. N/T Upthevibe Sep 16 #10

Science! Iggo Sep 16 #11

In Science We Trust. twodogsbarking Sep 16 #12

Good assessment of what a disaster Trump is. It needs to be repeated as often GoodRaisin Sep 16 #13

TY & Scientific American! Cha Sep 16 #14

K&R riverkittenDem Sep 16 #16

Very scientifically done! dchill Sep 16 #18

Who was the other endorsement? Bev54 Sep 16 #20

The most interesting magazine in the world? whopis01 Sep 16 #33

Big Woop. Donald has Taylor Swift's boyfriend's co-worker's wife... progressoid Sep 16 #21

She liked one of his tweets, or whatever they are called but I am not sure she has Bev54 Sep 16 #36

Yep. progressoid Sep 16 #38

No, Taylor did outright endorse her. Elessar Zappa Sep 16 #41

We are talking about Britany Mahomes Bev54 Sep 16 #45

Ah ok. Elessar Zappa Sep 16 #46

The tweet (xeet? truth? argle-bargle? ...whatever) that she liked, Chellee Sep 16 #47

SA: doing what science does. yonder Sep 16 #23

A lot of MAGATs are anti-science and anti-intellectual, so they probably Poiuyt Sep 16 #24

They definitely aren't scientific Americans Nasruddin Sep 16 #29

Something tells me this endorsement will have little influence Mysterian Sep 16 #25

Lib Republicans Nasruddin Sep 16 #30

I disagree. murielm99 Sep 16 #34

Been there and lived that Nasruddin Sep 16 #44

Too bad the first one wasn't Al Gore. LisaM Sep 16 #31

Because science matters! It's something we all take for granted, but without it, we'd all be worse off and ffr Sep 16 #32

The scientists get it: Chump can never be allowed back in the White House FakeNoose Sep 16 #35

Scientists are probably the demographic jfz9580m Sep 16 #54

Yay SA! jfz9580m Sep 16 #39

"The failing Scientific American magazine... johnnyfins Sep 16 #43

Correct except it would be jfz9580m Sep 16 #53

You can expect the orange monster to say this is fake news and Scientific American magazine is kimbutgar Sep 16 #48

K&R Blue Owl Sep 16 #51

This message was self-deleted by its author Chin music Sep 16 #52

Lots of good reasons to vote for Harris. Aussie105 Sep 17 #55