Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Luminous Animal

(27,310 posts)
3. Nathan Fuller, Day 4
Fri Dec 7, 2012, 06:12 PM
Dec 2012

More Manning testimony during which he discusses his attempts to have his POI status removed.
http://www.bradleymanning.org/news/ft-meade-113012-bradley-manning-exhausted-all-legal-avenues-to-end-harsh-treatment

As early as August 2010, Bradley told his psychiatrist Cpt. William Hoctor that he wanted to end POI watch, and Cpt. Hoctor soon after recommended relaxing Bradley’s treatment. As early as September 2010, Bradley asked his brig counselor, Gunnery Sergeant Blenis, how his incarceration status could be improved. Blenis told him that Cpt. Hoctor had recommended POI, so Bradley assumed he needed to demonstrate improved mental health. Around this time, Coombs also emailed the prosecution to announce Bradley’s desire to be removed from POI, and ask if there was anything the government could do. Bradley Manning made it very clear that he sought to be removed from segregation.

On December 10, Bradley asked Cpt. Hoctor why he had recommended POI status, and Cpt. Hoctor clarified that he had long been advising Quantico officials that there was no mental health reason to keep Bradley in isolation. The discrepancy confused Bradley, and he didn’t know whom to trust.

Since his stay at Quantico, Bradley had been answering semi-weekly questionnaires given by Army command, and before this time he said that he understood why he was on POI, even though he wanted to be off it. Thanks to GYSGT Blenis’ deception, Bradley still thought POI was Cpt. Hoctor’s doing. When he learned otherwise, Bradley documented in 22 questionnaires that he didn’t understand his custody status.

Bradley’s attorney David Coombs then asked brig commander CWO Averhart to re-evaluate Bradley’s status. Bradley testified that “obviously nothing happened.”
Nathan Fuller, Day 2: Luminous Animal Dec 2012 #1
Nathan Fuller, Day 3 Luminous Animal Dec 2012 #2
Nathan Fuller, Day 4 Luminous Animal Dec 2012 #3
Nathan Fuller, Day 5 Luminous Animal Dec 2012 #4
Nathan Fuller, Day 6 Luminous Animal Dec 2012 #5
Nathan Fuller, Day 7 Luminous Animal Dec 2012 #6
Kick. Luminous Animal Dec 2012 #7
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Manning: daily reporting ...»Reply #3