Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

obamanut2012

(26,047 posts)
9. He only lost some of his property, far from all of it
Mon Dec 3, 2012, 06:54 PM
Dec 2012

And, he received a payment for the property later.

And was given, if I remember right, the first amnesty pardon.

He lived a full life after the War, full of privilege and honor.

I am agaist the DP, but under law, he should have hanged obamanut2012 Dec 2012 #1
Wasn't Lee's property confiscated? Arlington National Cemetery sits on property once owned by Lee. n bluestate10 Dec 2012 #5
He only lost some of his property, far from all of it obamanut2012 Dec 2012 #9
He died in 1870, five years after Appomattox, Art_from_Ark Dec 2012 #24
It was actually confiscated during the war for nonpayment of taxes. MadrasT Dec 2012 #11
I believe he still lived on part of it. sweetloukillbot Dec 2012 #19
No. Lee never returned to Arlington. MadrasT Dec 2012 #22
Interesting - yet another historical urban legend. sweetloukillbot Dec 2012 #31
and strung up from the nearest tree dlwickham Dec 2012 #2
Lee, AND all the other leading figures of the Confederacy. kestrel91316 Dec 2012 #3
I voted no. bluestate10 Dec 2012 #4
He was offered generalship of the Union Army obamanut2012 Dec 2012 #10
The hindsight of history makes geniuses out of us all... Bicoastal Dec 2012 #29
No I agree with Lincoln's soft reconstruction Drale Dec 2012 #6
^^^^THIS^^^^ Tuesday Afternoon Dec 2012 #17
That's a point that so many people here miss Art_from_Ark Dec 2012 #25
He surrendered under terms that paroled him. It's like taking a Plea deal in modern day. NutmegYankee Dec 2012 #7
I voted No, John2 Dec 2012 #21
no. there was a nation to heal. cali Dec 2012 #8
He was indicted for it.. SQUEE Dec 2012 #12
No. That would have harmed the nation's rebuilding. Fearless Dec 2012 #13
I added my voice to the "No" votes. I am reminded of the line from coalition_unwilling Dec 2012 #14
Good Question sarisataka Dec 2012 #15
Lincoln knew better. MrSlayer Dec 2012 #16
Mercy. Tuesday Afternoon Dec 2012 #18
Every member of the ruling class within the confederacy should have been tried and convicted. Dawson Leery Dec 2012 #20
Unlike Stonewall Jackson, Lee was a traitor because Lee swore an oath of alliegence to byeya Dec 2012 #23
I voted no. dawg Dec 2012 #26
I didn't vote - ohheckyeah Dec 2012 #27
Wouldn't that mean you hold the whole south for treason? Not very practical if you are trying to still_one Dec 2012 #28
I voted no. The situation was so, so complicated. pangaia Dec 2012 #30
No and anyone that suggests it FARAFIELD Dec 2012 #32
I think 150 years later, it's very hard to judge the sentiment of the 1860's. HereSince1628 Dec 2012 #33
great quote there: "With malice toward none, with charity toward all" Tuesday Afternoon Dec 2012 #34
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Should Robert E. Lee Have...»Reply #9