Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

BumRushDaShow

(139,342 posts)
16. He was sent packing when ABC wanted to "cut costs" after the 538 2022 poll failures
Fri Jul 19, 2024, 03:44 PM
Jul 19

They kept the "538" brand and discarded its founder.

Nate Silver Out at ABC News as Disney Layoffs Once Again Hit News Division

April 25, 2023 9:18am

The second round of Disney layoffs hit ABC News on Tuesday, with Nate Silver’s data-driven politics and journalism brand FiveThirtyEight among those being impacted.

Silver told FiveThirtyEight employees in a Slack message that he expects to leave Disney when his contract is up, which he added would be “soon,” The Hollywood Reporter has learned.

ABC News is expected to keep the FiveThirtyEight brand name, with plans to streamline the site and make it more efficient.

“ABC News remains dedicated to data journalism with a core focus on politics, the economy and enterprise reporting — this streamlined structure will allow us to be more closely aligned with our priorities for the 2024 election and beyond,” an ABC News spokesperson said in a statement. “We are grateful for the invaluable contributions of the team members who will be departing the organization and know they will continue to make an important impact on the future of journalism.”

(snip)

https://www.hollywoodreporter.com/business/digital/nate-silver-leaves-538-abc-news-disney-layoffs-1235401689/


What I Got Wrong In 2022

By Nathaniel Rakich

Dec. 28, 2022, at 6:00 AM


Here’s a prediction that 100 percent, absolutely, positively will come true: I will get something wrong in 2023. Here at FiveThirtyEight, we make a lot of predictions every year; some of them work out, but we can’t get every single one right.  We can, however, learn from our mistakes. That’s why I like to write about everything I got wrong in the previous 12 months.1 I do this for two reasons: First, they’re often unintentionally hilarious (and when you’re a politics reporter, sometimes you need a laugh); second, identifying my blind spots has helped me become a better analyst.

And there’s no shortage of material for this year’s installment. Let’s start with a tweet I wrote on Nov. 6, 2020, shortly after it became clear that Joe Biden had won the presidential race: “Congratulations to Republicans on their victory in the 2022 midterms!” This was obviously meant to be snarky but also to communicate a political tenet: that the president’s party almost always has a bad midterm election. Of course, that tweet wasn’t from 2022, but I also made this argument in January of this year. And for several months thereafter, my analysis was colored by my expectation that 2022 would be a good election year for Republicans. As everyone knows by now, the midterms were a disappointment for Republicans. They won the House — but only barely (they gained just nine seats on net). Meanwhile, Democrats gained a seat in the Senate.



Clearly, I was overly confident in my early prediction. While it is true that the president’s party almost always has a poor midterm, there have been exceptions. And the 2022 midterms turned out to be one of these “asterisk elections,” thanks in no small part to the Supreme Court’s decision in Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization to overturn the constitutional right to abortion. This year I should have been more prepared for the possibility that the ruling could throw a wrench into the election, especially after a draft of the decision was leaked in May. And even after the decision, it took me a while to become convinced that voter anger over Dobbs would prove durable enough to last until Election Day.

It wasn’t until the fall that I revised my expectations from a “red wave” to a “red ripple.” My biggest mistake here was not realizing just how common an “asterisk election” actually is. I often quoted one key stat: that the president’s party had gained House seats in only two of the previous 19 midterm elections. But there were four other midterms where the president’s party lost fewer than 10 House seats — so what happened in 2022 isn’t that rare. I also neglected to remember that the president’s party had lost Senate seats in only 13 of the last 19 midterms. In other words, midterms like 2022 happen about a third of the time — way too frequently to count them out.

(snip)

https://fivethirtyeight.com/features/2022-predictions-i-got-wrong/
Thank you BoRaGard Jul 19 #1
As of today wryter2000 Jul 19 #2
Did you know that Nate Silver hasn't been with 538 since mid 2023? Native Jul 19 #4
Really??? Hmmmmmm a kennedy Jul 19 #5
https://www.natesilver.net/p/why-i-dont-buy-538s-new-election Native Jul 19 #12
He was sent packing when ABC wanted to "cut costs" after the 538 2022 poll failures BumRushDaShow Jul 19 #16
So now he's a Peter-Thiel wholly-owned subsidiary? calimary Jul 19 #23
This message was self-deleted by its author Blue Cape Jul 19 #6
I didn't wryter2000 Jul 19 #22
there have been a couple of posts about it here, but not many Native Jul 19 #26
I've been taking it that way for awhile. ananda Jul 19 #21
Great work exposing this! GoreWon2000 Jul 19 #3
Odd, have been watching Nate for years. Suspiciously. Not surprised. THX for post. nt allegorical oracle Jul 19 #7
Another outsider trying to buy a country WhiteTara Jul 19 #8
Yes ... and it's getting very old. These "outsiders" are/were KPN Jul 19 #10
I said the exact same thing yesterday to a friend mtngirl47 Jul 19 #14
We need to get the word out karin_sj Jul 19 #9
Never thought he was very good when he was with 538. Did not think his results were very accurate. Fla Dem Jul 19 #11
Hmmmm.,,Current 538 polling shows Biden leading? surfered Jul 19 #13
Keith Olbermann had some things to say about nate several months ago. niyad Jul 19 #15
I was getting very skeptical of Nate Silver; not surprised he's ben purchased by right wing money. patphil Jul 19 #17
Very Interesting... Punx Jul 19 #18
People with too much money... 2naSalit Jul 19 #19
Everyone has their price. OMGWTF Jul 19 #20
Boy, no kidding. calimary Jul 19 #24
Reminded me of this - k55f5r Jul 19 #27
Nate Silver Has... GB_RN Jul 19 #25
Woah. Nate Silver left 538 in April 2023; joined Thiel's outfit in June '24 Mersky Jul 20 #28
Thiel made Silver and offer he couldn't refuse. BradBo Jul 20 #29
But, didn't 538 show Biden winning? Baitball Blogger Jul 20 #30
Love it! whathehell Jul 20 #31
Thanks for the info Roc2020 Jul 20 #32
K&R Alice Kramden Jul 20 #33
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»This message was self-del...»Reply #16