Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: This message was self-deleted by its author [View all]BumRushDaShow
(139,342 posts)16. He was sent packing when ABC wanted to "cut costs" after the 538 2022 poll failures
They kept the "538" brand and discarded its founder.
Nate Silver Out at ABC News as Disney Layoffs Once Again Hit News Division
April 25, 2023 9:18am
The second round of Disney layoffs hit ABC News on Tuesday, with Nate Silvers data-driven politics and journalism brand FiveThirtyEight among those being impacted.
Silver told FiveThirtyEight employees in a Slack message that he expects to leave Disney when his contract is up, which he added would be soon, The Hollywood Reporter has learned.
ABC News is expected to keep the FiveThirtyEight brand name, with plans to streamline the site and make it more efficient.
ABC News remains dedicated to data journalism with a core focus on politics, the economy and enterprise reporting this streamlined structure will allow us to be more closely aligned with our priorities for the 2024 election and beyond, an ABC News spokesperson said in a statement. We are grateful for the invaluable contributions of the team members who will be departing the organization and know they will continue to make an important impact on the future of journalism.
(snip)
https://www.hollywoodreporter.com/business/digital/nate-silver-leaves-538-abc-news-disney-layoffs-1235401689/
April 25, 2023 9:18am
The second round of Disney layoffs hit ABC News on Tuesday, with Nate Silvers data-driven politics and journalism brand FiveThirtyEight among those being impacted.
Silver told FiveThirtyEight employees in a Slack message that he expects to leave Disney when his contract is up, which he added would be soon, The Hollywood Reporter has learned.
ABC News is expected to keep the FiveThirtyEight brand name, with plans to streamline the site and make it more efficient.
ABC News remains dedicated to data journalism with a core focus on politics, the economy and enterprise reporting this streamlined structure will allow us to be more closely aligned with our priorities for the 2024 election and beyond, an ABC News spokesperson said in a statement. We are grateful for the invaluable contributions of the team members who will be departing the organization and know they will continue to make an important impact on the future of journalism.
(snip)
https://www.hollywoodreporter.com/business/digital/nate-silver-leaves-538-abc-news-disney-layoffs-1235401689/
What I Got Wrong In 2022
By Nathaniel Rakich
Dec. 28, 2022, at 6:00 AM
Heres a prediction that 100 percent, absolutely, positively will come true: I will get something wrong in 2023. Here at FiveThirtyEight, we make a lot of predictions every year; some of them work out, but we cant get every single one right. We can, however, learn from our mistakes. Thats why I like to write about everything I got wrong in the previous 12 months.1 I do this for two reasons: First, theyre often unintentionally hilarious (and when youre a politics reporter, sometimes you need a laugh); second, identifying my blind spots has helped me become a better analyst.
And theres no shortage of material for this years installment. Lets start with a tweet I wrote on Nov. 6, 2020, shortly after it became clear that Joe Biden had won the presidential race: Congratulations to Republicans on their victory in the 2022 midterms! This was obviously meant to be snarky but also to communicate a political tenet: that the presidents party almost always has a bad midterm election. Of course, that tweet wasnt from 2022, but I also made this argument in January of this year. And for several months thereafter, my analysis was colored by my expectation that 2022 would be a good election year for Republicans. As everyone knows by now, the midterms were a disappointment for Republicans. They won the House but only barely (they gained just nine seats on net). Meanwhile, Democrats gained a seat in the Senate.
Clearly, I was overly confident in my early prediction. While it is true that the presidents party almost always has a poor midterm, there have been exceptions. And the 2022 midterms turned out to be one of these asterisk elections, thanks in no small part to the Supreme Courts decision in Dobbs v. Jackson Womens Health Organization to overturn the constitutional right to abortion. This year I should have been more prepared for the possibility that the ruling could throw a wrench into the election, especially after a draft of the decision was leaked in May. And even after the decision, it took me a while to become convinced that voter anger over Dobbs would prove durable enough to last until Election Day.
It wasnt until the fall that I revised my expectations from a red wave to a red ripple. My biggest mistake here was not realizing just how common an asterisk election actually is. I often quoted one key stat: that the presidents party had gained House seats in only two of the previous 19 midterm elections. But there were four other midterms where the presidents party lost fewer than 10 House seats so what happened in 2022 isnt that rare. I also neglected to remember that the presidents party had lost Senate seats in only 13 of the last 19 midterms. In other words, midterms like 2022 happen about a third of the time way too frequently to count them out.
(snip)
https://fivethirtyeight.com/features/2022-predictions-i-got-wrong/
By Nathaniel Rakich
Dec. 28, 2022, at 6:00 AM
Heres a prediction that 100 percent, absolutely, positively will come true: I will get something wrong in 2023. Here at FiveThirtyEight, we make a lot of predictions every year; some of them work out, but we cant get every single one right. We can, however, learn from our mistakes. Thats why I like to write about everything I got wrong in the previous 12 months.1 I do this for two reasons: First, theyre often unintentionally hilarious (and when youre a politics reporter, sometimes you need a laugh); second, identifying my blind spots has helped me become a better analyst.
And theres no shortage of material for this years installment. Lets start with a tweet I wrote on Nov. 6, 2020, shortly after it became clear that Joe Biden had won the presidential race: Congratulations to Republicans on their victory in the 2022 midterms! This was obviously meant to be snarky but also to communicate a political tenet: that the presidents party almost always has a bad midterm election. Of course, that tweet wasnt from 2022, but I also made this argument in January of this year. And for several months thereafter, my analysis was colored by my expectation that 2022 would be a good election year for Republicans. As everyone knows by now, the midterms were a disappointment for Republicans. They won the House but only barely (they gained just nine seats on net). Meanwhile, Democrats gained a seat in the Senate.
Clearly, I was overly confident in my early prediction. While it is true that the presidents party almost always has a poor midterm, there have been exceptions. And the 2022 midterms turned out to be one of these asterisk elections, thanks in no small part to the Supreme Courts decision in Dobbs v. Jackson Womens Health Organization to overturn the constitutional right to abortion. This year I should have been more prepared for the possibility that the ruling could throw a wrench into the election, especially after a draft of the decision was leaked in May. And even after the decision, it took me a while to become convinced that voter anger over Dobbs would prove durable enough to last until Election Day.
It wasnt until the fall that I revised my expectations from a red wave to a red ripple. My biggest mistake here was not realizing just how common an asterisk election actually is. I often quoted one key stat: that the presidents party had gained House seats in only two of the previous 19 midterm elections. But there were four other midterms where the presidents party lost fewer than 10 House seats so what happened in 2022 isnt that rare. I also neglected to remember that the presidents party had lost Senate seats in only 13 of the last 19 midterms. In other words, midterms like 2022 happen about a third of the time way too frequently to count them out.
(snip)
https://fivethirtyeight.com/features/2022-predictions-i-got-wrong/
TopBack to the top of the page
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
ShareGet links to this post
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
Cannot edit, recommend, or reply in locked discussions
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
33 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
He was sent packing when ABC wanted to "cut costs" after the 538 2022 poll failures
BumRushDaShow
Jul 19
#16
Odd, have been watching Nate for years. Suspiciously. Not surprised. THX for post. nt
allegorical oracle
Jul 19
#7
Never thought he was very good when he was with 538. Did not think his results were very accurate.
Fla Dem
Jul 19
#11