Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

Zeitghost

(4,557 posts)

11. I could be off here

Reply to Prairie Gates (Original post)

Mon Jul 15, 2024, 05:31 PM

Jul 2024

But aren't all Judge's rulings limited to their particular case? With an appeals court limited to their district and the Supreme Court setting president nationwide.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

12 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

"The effect of this order is confined to this proceeding." [View all] Prairie Gates Jul 2024 OP

that makes this even more ridiculous bigtree Jul 2024 #1

The constitutionality of SC's was already adjudicated in Meuller. Nt Fiendish Thingy Jul 2024 #2

Chutkan can force the issue by finding just that Prairie Gates Jul 2024 #7

How can a special counsel appointment be unconstitutional Ocelot II Jul 2024 #3

If Trump gets control the case is toast. He'll give it the classified documents treatment. live love laugh Jul 2024 #4

That's an intolerable constititional situation that the Republican Supreme Court will have to jump in on. bucolic_frolic Jul 2024 #5

Correct Prairie Gates Jul 2024 #6

Shades of Bush v. Gore Qutzupalotl Jul 2024 #8

Under Cannon's and Thomas' reasoning, Hunter Biden's conviction needs to be reversed LetMyPeopleVote Jul 2024 #9

The new conservative reasoning is that Special Counsel appointments count Prairie Gates Jul 2024 #10

I could be off here Zeitghost Jul 2024 #11

Yes, as stated in the OP Prairie Gates Jul 2024 #12