Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

Prairie Gates

(4,946 posts)

7. I mean, it was clearly a collaborative document, as are they all

Reply to dalton99a (Reply #3)

Mon Jul 15, 2024, 01:24 PM

Jul 2024

I use "Cannon" as shorthand. The arguments and tone certainly mirror FS arguments and suggest that whatever clerk(s) assisted also argued in that way.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

8 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Cannon's cunning argument on Appropriations Clause [View all] Prairie Gates Jul 2024 OP

It has felt like stage-setting for a while now Sympthsical Jul 2024 #1

Okay atreides1 Jul 2024 #2

Seems Cannon had help from the Federalist Society dalton99a Jul 2024 #3

I mean, it was clearly a collaborative document, as are they all Prairie Gates Jul 2024 #7

A bought and paid for Federal judge. republianmushroom Jul 2024 #4

The bulk of the evidence was obtained by Garland's DOJ BEFORE Smith was appointed Special Counsel Fiendish Thingy Jul 2024 #5

Good point Prairie Gates Jul 2024 #6

Holy cow you're correct! Maru Kitteh Jul 2024 #8