Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

(15,327 posts)

8. Shades of Bush v. Gore

Mon Jul 15, 2024, 11:29 AM

Jul 2024

in that it's not to be used as precedent anywhere else.

The 11th should boot her over this. Should.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

1 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

12 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

"The effect of this order is confined to this proceeding." [View all] Prairie Gates Jul 2024 OP

that makes this even more ridiculous bigtree Jul 2024 #1

The constitutionality of SC's was already adjudicated in Meuller. Nt Fiendish Thingy Jul 2024 #2

Chutkan can force the issue by finding just that Prairie Gates Jul 2024 #7

How can a special counsel appointment be unconstitutional Ocelot II Jul 2024 #3

Correct Prairie Gates Jul 2024 #6

Shades of Bush v. Gore Qutzupalotl Jul 2024 #8

The new conservative reasoning is that Special Counsel appointments count Prairie Gates Jul 2024 #10

I could be off here Zeitghost Jul 2024 #11

Yes, as stated in the OP Prairie Gates Jul 2024 #12