Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

bucolic_frolic

(45,734 posts)

22. Who would have standing? And how does a no-standing case go all the way to SCOTUS?

Reply to In It to Win It (Original post)

Thu Jun 13, 2024, 11:05 AM

Jun 2024

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

36 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

SCOTUS unanimously says that plaintiffs lack standing to challenge FDA regulations of mifepristone [View all] In It to Win It Jun 2024 OP

They don't want to further hurt Republicans this year. RandySF Jun 2024 #1

Fuck them. We're coming. onecaliberal Jun 2024 #34

Big win for human rights Johnny2X2X Jun 2024 #2

SCOTUS had to take this case. House of Roberts Jun 2024 #11

Oh right, I forgot Johnny2X2X Jun 2024 #13

This message was self-deleted by its author hlthe2b Jun 2024 #3

So you wanted the 5th Circuit ruling to stand? Zeitghost Jun 2024 #21

Post removed Post removed Jun 2024 #25

Next - no Immunity malaise Jun 2024 #4

SCOTUSblog says we have to wait until next week for that opinion? blogslug Jun 2024 #16

Would be the perfect birthday present malaise Jun 2024 #18

I don't understand. She says next week. Then she says maybe tomorrow? Takket Jun 2024 #19

It's hard to tell from the excerpt, but those comments are from 2 different posters. sl8 Jun 2024 #23

I don't understand either blogslug Jun 2024 #28

Well I'll be damned. lamp_shade Jun 2024 #5

For now.............................. Lovie777 Jun 2024 #6

Fucking weasels Stinky The Clown Jun 2024 #7

There are anti abortion people who will see this ruling as an invitation wnylib Jun 2024 #33

They had to take the case... appmanga Jun 2024 #8

The 5th Circuit said they had standing... so yes they had to take the case. In It to Win It Jun 2024 #12

This should have been a minute order (nt) appmanga Jun 2024 #17

EXACTLY! bluestarone Jun 2024 #30

BREAKING: Supreme Court rejects bid to restrict access to abortion pill. LetMyPeopleVote Jun 2024 #9

The plaintiffs in the Mifepristone case lack standing, the Supreme Court rules. LetMyPeopleVote Jun 2024 #10

Will Trump figure out a way to take credit for it? "I appointed the judges who......" Ping Tung Jun 2024 #14

So sorry, Matthew...now go sod off. pecosbob Jun 2024 #15

The problem here is what will SCOTUS do if someone who DOES have standing makes a case Takket Jun 2024 #20

AGREE! This long and NO ACTUAL ruling on the issue! bluestarone Jun 2024 #31

Who would have standing? And how does a no-standing case go all the way to SCOTUS? bucolic_frolic Jun 2024 #22

The trial court and appeals court said they had standing In It to Win It Jun 2024 #26

147 republicans in Congress begged the court to ban the drug and told women to go to hell. LetMyPeopleVote Jun 2024 #24

This ultimately won't matter because they plan on outlawing in under Comstock. Nevilledog Jun 2024 #27

And cock blocks Convicted Felon returning to scene of the crime. Virtually no MSNBC coverage! GreenWave Jun 2024 #29

Plaintiffs did not have standing to sue, elleng Jun 2024 #32

There never, ever was "standing." Tarzanrock Jun 2024 #35

Statement from President Joe Biden on Supreme Court Decision on FDA v. Alliance for Hippocratic Medicine LetMyPeopleVote Jun 2024 #36