Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: What Spielberg’s “Lincoln” conveniently leaves out [View all]bluestateguy
(44,173 posts)55. This is not a secret
Typically Republican politicians of the mid 19th century were very buddy-buddy with the railroads. Republicans favored government subsidy for the railroads and internal improvement projects (what we call infrastructure today) that would necessitate a broader railroad network.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
104 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
well, he only spent the first 20 minutes re-creating the landing at Omaha Beach
WolverineDG
Nov 2012
#28
How do you KNOW he didn't build a time machine and influence the actual events of the landing...
Ian David
Nov 2012
#78
"D-Day vets said it was ... like being there". And we know this how? Astroturfing.
AnotherMcIntosh
Nov 2012
#24
Not "astroturfing" at all. A simple Google search will bring up a number of....
OldDem2012
Nov 2012
#61
Actually, a respected combat vet and paratrooper, and who was familiar with movie making,
AnotherMcIntosh
Nov 2012
#86
You mention that you wish that you were on Spielberg's payroll. I'm sure that you do.
AnotherMcIntosh
Nov 2012
#77
Just curious, but which characters in "Saving Private Ryan" did you feel were undeveloped? nt.
OldDem2012
Nov 2012
#18
me too. i haven't seen all his films, but the ones i have seen made me not want to see the others.
HiPointDem
Nov 2012
#64
My daughters are finally old enough that we watched Pulp Fiction together a couple days ago.
randome
Nov 2012
#71
I don't like taratino either (nothing personal, i just don't). It's been a while, actually,
HiPointDem
Nov 2012
#103
I totally disagree. He is a GREAT film maker. Everthing from "Jaws" to "Close Encounters" to the
RBInMaine
Nov 2012
#70
Uh, Spielberg is awesome. As a director, he has created some of the most iconic films in history
zonkers
Nov 2012
#87
It is not about being successful but how you become successful. We have used the idea of
jwirr
Nov 2012
#13
I was thinking about the use of this method by Rome/England in the expansion of their Empires.
jwirr
Nov 2012
#58
Put the use of manifest destiny methodology is not new - it has been the practice of most empires.
jwirr
Nov 2012
#59
I will. I don't agree with the article. I just thought it would be interesting discussion. nt
mfcorey1
Nov 2012
#90
And Native Americans can testify to your last statement. They died in droves so that the barons
jwirr
Nov 2012
#10
Here's a good article on the choices made by the filmmakers on what to include
Beaverhausen
Nov 2012
#19
Mhm. Every human has flaws. When they have as much power as a President, they're only amplified. nt
Comrade_McKenzie
Nov 2012
#47
He was the only candidate that ran on limiting slavery to slave states.
Starry Messenger
Nov 2012
#30
the OP article in Salon shows everything that is wrong with those who are never satisfied
graham4anything
Nov 2012
#31
Yup. I do think myself that Spielberg wanted that to be the main thing people got out of the movie
graham4anything
Nov 2012
#44
Speilberg is, himself, a plutocrat. You can't expect him to make a class-based critique. Period.
leveymg
Nov 2012
#33
I am also a fan of a lot of Spielberg's movies, even if I disagree with some of his politics.
leveymg
Nov 2012
#45
Until we change our form of governance, the best that America can hope for is
Egalitarian Thug
Nov 2012
#35
What can't all movies about American heroes instead focus on how awful they are?
4th law of robotics
Nov 2012
#42
Why can't the world be pure black and white, good vs evil, like an old-fashioned comic book?
leveymg
Nov 2012
#48
I still haven't been able to see it. I'm hoping to get to go this Thursday.
liberal_at_heart
Nov 2012
#51
"a service to the country and to humanity in general." True, but England beat us to it by 32 years
WinkyDink
Nov 2012
#96
Lincoln spoke publically in support of slavery as late as 1861. Spielberg has whitewashed history.
Romulox
Nov 2012
#98
it's actually an important fact in considering who his backers were & the reasons for the
HiPointDem
Nov 2012
#104