Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

teddy51

(3,491 posts)
17. Yes there is a time to get defensive when we have people on DU that are trying to shut down
Fri Nov 23, 2012, 10:45 PM
Nov 2012

an open discussion and what some deem as not in there liking. I have a statement for those that are trying to shut vote stealing (as a cyber crime) discussion down. Go away, and don't participate in the discussion if you don't like the topic.

My opinion; I think the polls were skewed that way for a purpose, and that purpose (if things had teddy51 Nov 2012 #1
DURec and Kick. Very interesting!! longship Nov 2012 #2
An election CAN be stolen RandySF Nov 2012 #3
We all know about 2000. longship Nov 2012 #4
I agree. RandySF Nov 2012 #5
Are you trying to tell us that we can't discuss that particular topic... OldDem2012 Nov 2012 #7
Wow, let them express their opinions. Coyotl Nov 2012 #8
Yes there is a time to get defensive when we have people on DU that are trying to shut down teddy51 Nov 2012 #17
Your characterization is not true Coyotl Nov 2012 #49
In spite of your objectionable tone, I will respond. longship Nov 2012 #10
Dude, check out this link RobertEarl Nov 2012 #11
History? Don't you mean post hoc fallacies? longship Nov 2012 #13
Now why would anyone want to argue with your logic, I am certain you don't want to hear teddy51 Nov 2012 #14
Hmmm RobertEarl Nov 2012 #15
I know! Wasp and Plague and Bob "The Dog" did it!!! longship Nov 2012 #19
No pal, your the one that's ignorant. You obviously have no IT experience and therefore have no teddy51 Nov 2012 #20
Ignorant? It's "you're" not "your" longship Nov 2012 #23
Wow, lol ... I guess we have broken you down when you get to Spelling and grammar. teddy51 Nov 2012 #26
There will be evidence RobertEarl Nov 2012 #22
See my response #16 longship Nov 2012 #24
Yeah, sure, dude RobertEarl Nov 2012 #27
I agree with you. For some reason there are those on DU that seem to have a problem admitting teddy51 Nov 2012 #12
A straw man argument. longship Nov 2012 #16
"Look! Our system hangs on the edge. But it still functions, in spite of the GOP oppression." teddy51 Nov 2012 #18
No! The language I am trying to shut down is this. longship Nov 2012 #21
No pal, you are the pathetic one! I don't know if a source such as Anonymous was involved in any teddy51 Nov 2012 #25
Can you believe that dude? RobertEarl Nov 2012 #30
Good job Robert and I have your back! I will not sit here 12 years later and pretend that any teddy51 Nov 2012 #31
We know in 2008 the turnout smoked the theft RobertEarl Nov 2012 #38
We talk about the actual Presidential election, but not about the house that may or may not teddy51 Nov 2012 #40
Read two reports from 2010 RobertEarl Nov 2012 #41
Where was the stolen election? longship Nov 2012 #33
Just go away! You have no credentials in this argument anymore. You have proven your utter teddy51 Nov 2012 #36
If anyone wants to know... Agschmid Nov 2012 #43
"The language I am trying to shut down"??????????????????????????????????????????? WinkyDink Nov 2012 #29
There was no fucking stolen election in 2012!!! longship Nov 2012 #34
No thanks to you, but it certainly could have been. And if it had been! What would you have said teddy51 Nov 2012 #39
I entirely agree with you on this. longship Nov 2012 #42
A dozen primary elections were electronically flipped to Romney! reusrename Nov 2012 #58
Yes. He won because it wasn't close. aquart Nov 2012 #54
Two things theKed Nov 2012 #56
You know who else are "thick"? Smug DU'ers who think they have a lock on the unknowable. WinkyDink Nov 2012 #28
The unknowable? longship Nov 2012 #37
Tin Foil Hats have nothing to do with it -- it is the ugly reality of our election history Samantha Nov 2012 #44
Well, you have your facts straight there. longship Nov 2012 #45
Thank you, and obviously the Republicans did not steal 2012 Samantha Nov 2012 #46
"46. Thank you, and obviously the Republicans did not steal 2012" longship Nov 2012 #47
I think Romney defeated Romney (not to take away from the outstanding ground game of the Dems) Samantha Nov 2012 #50
Thanks to this post, I now understand where I disagree with you. Jim Lane Nov 2012 #48
Great post! Lisa0825 Nov 2012 #51
Yeah, electronic voting is completely tamper proof. Don't worry! Go back to sleep now, kiddies. Zorra Nov 2012 #53
Simplistic and not backed up with any evidence at all. aquart Nov 2012 #52
It didn't seem to have worked longship Nov 2012 #55
There were stolen elections. In the primaries. reusrename Nov 2012 #59
I wish the geniuses behind the scenes would stop giving away such sensitive info. JaneyVee Nov 2012 #6
+ 1,000 n/t KT2000 Nov 2012 #35
Interesting, THANKS. nt Raine Nov 2012 #9
Great reading! thanks for posting this. hrmjustin Nov 2012 #32
it seems the biggest disconnect was simply focusing on the national instead of state numbers unblock Nov 2012 #57
Something different happened this year. RandySF Nov 2012 #60
This was a great OP. Raine1967 Nov 2012 #61
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»VERY detailed article on ...»Reply #17