Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Weird! Anonymous is *horrible*, but harming the 99% is nothing to worry our little minds about? [View all]cherokeeprogressive
(24,853 posts)138. First there must be "something" to be involved in. Get that?
Just EXACTLY what is it you want to believe so badly that anonymous was involved in?
And please, don't give me the "they were going to steal the election and anonymous stopped it!" bullshit. That's just too vague.
So do tell... what, WHAT was the situation anonymous took action about and stopped?
For there to be involvement, there has to be there there. Yup.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
185 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Weird! Anonymous is *horrible*, but harming the 99% is nothing to worry our little minds about? [View all]
MannyGoldstein
Nov 2012
OP
one could post proof and evidence to one's claims, couldn't one? otherwise it's just make believe nt
msongs
Nov 2012
#1
I don't understand what you are asking proof of! Is it possible that they could have been
teddy51
Nov 2012
#8
I serve on juries here all the time thanks, and I have not heard anyone complain about
teddy51
Nov 2012
#14
What's your point, if you even have one? I'm asking those that are asking others
teddy51
Nov 2012
#23
One can prove there are no even prime numbers larger than 2, but that is not
cthulu2016
Nov 2012
#52
lol Your a little late to the party, but WTF I will be a good sport. Watch this video, and get
teddy51
Nov 2012
#139
In the last 20 seconds of that video, Hartmann says "IF this is true..."
cherokeeprogressive
Nov 2012
#140
Well I am not saying now, nor have I ever said that Anonymous had anything to do with the election.
teddy51
Nov 2012
#141
Make believe. I must be a CT because I am of the opinion that George Bush was never a legitimately
sabrina 1
Nov 2012
#48
Agree!!! And IMO Karl Rove and his ilk are dangerous to the survival of the US. n/t
RKP5637
Nov 2012
#128
It is true code can delete itself... It is also true that it can not remove all traces it was there
Ohio Joe
Nov 2012
#148
You ask this because you; A. haven't thought it through. B. Appear to be vested in denying any form
Egalitarian Thug
Nov 2012
#127
"It's interesting how some posters are making a concerted effort to wipe out any notion that
teddy51
Nov 2012
#2
I have to say I agree. Some posters are completely rabid about the fact that others
Squinch
Nov 2012
#77
Did you happen to watch this video? Well why don't you do that and get back to me!
teddy51
Nov 2012
#113
Actually Anonymous is claiming they prevented the election from being altered
dflprincess
Nov 2012
#137
One of us either has severe difficulty understanding the English language, or...
MannyGoldstein
Nov 2012
#18
That seemed clear enough to me. Many of the same people throwing a fit over what was most likely
sabrina 1
Nov 2012
#51
So you don't believe that Obama *offered* and *agreed* to cut Social Security by 10%
MannyGoldstein
Nov 2012
#179
Thank you, most of the claims in this thread are opinions, which I guess we are supposed to side
patrice
Nov 2012
#78
IIRC, the only things that I predicted are that Obama would eventually call for cuts
MannyGoldstein
Nov 2012
#154
Nope, much like he could not get a public option without help from Congress.
JoePhilly
Nov 2012
#168
If you want to claim he's going to do something, then tell us when and why, and how.
JoePhilly
Nov 2012
#182
What's interesting to me is why anyone cares if Anon 'defamed' Karl Rove by suggesting
sabrina 1
Nov 2012
#53
What is intresting to me is that some people are obviously very uncomfortable with Dem grassroots'
patrice
Nov 2012
#79
One of the things that distinguishes us from right wingers is our insistence on facts and evidence.
stevenleser
Nov 2012
#22
To be clear, it's very reasonable to ask for evidence before believing this - or anything
MannyGoldstein
Nov 2012
#25
And I think it would be just as prudent for those that don't believe they were to prove that.
teddy51
Nov 2012
#26
A good explanation of how 'proofing the negative' is generally not possible.
stevenleser
Nov 2012
#38
He is a great speaker. I hope to get the chance to see him in person some day. nt
stevenleser
Nov 2012
#160
With the burden of proof on the people who made the claim that Anonymous did anything at all
AtheistCrusader
Nov 2012
#75
And then to build those deuling conspiracies on other, older conspiracies is suspicious
Coyotl
Nov 2012
#88
I guess I don't understand the difference between ordinary proof and extradanary proof.
ZombieHorde
Nov 2012
#106
I agree with that, but what is the difference between the two types of proofs?
ZombieHorde
Nov 2012
#112
Ordinary proof would still leave substantial room for doubt, but there is room for discussion.
RomneyLies
Nov 2012
#123
At this point I think we should just start spamming these goofy Anon threads with that quote.
phleshdef
Nov 2012
#62
"We hacked the planet! and saved Democracy but we can't prove it" is pretty damn extraordinary.
phleshdef
Nov 2012
#64
You are right. That was over the top. I was trying to point out that CT deniers dont deny everything
rhett o rick
Nov 2012
#102
Once again I agree that is was over the top. My frustration with deniers got the best of me.
rhett o rick
Nov 2012
#156
Great Post , you've got them running around the room with their hair on fire.
bahrbearian
Nov 2012
#82
Is it so terrible that some one claims something without proof , that makes people think about how
bahrbearian
Nov 2012
#85
You do realize you can click the "edit" link on a post and add things as you think of them, right?
jeff47
Nov 2012
#110
Gee ,I saw that you already replied and I didn't want you to miss another chance.
bahrbearian
Nov 2012
#114
Alls you need now is a response from our in-house freeper , and I think you have a Full Boat.
bahrbearian
Nov 2012
#86
There are still two people who haven't started a thread with an opinion about the unprovable
Coyotl
Nov 2012
#92
DU will never look stupid making fun of Karl Rove. I am afraid of the opposite
sabrina 1
Nov 2012
#124
Weird? Why, no, not really, Manny. Anonymous will be monitoring Democratic primaries for fraud
Zorra
Nov 2012
#144
Yes. Unfortunately, RW wealthy private interests have a permanent interest in neutralizing the
Zorra
Nov 2012
#184
Stop delegitimizing the amazing landslide re-election of President Obama.(as I predicted 4 yrs. back
graham4anything
Nov 2012
#152
No, Edwards was NOT a good choice. Had you known me then, you would know I thought so then
graham4anything
Nov 2012
#172
Kerry won? I was looking at my placemat of the president, and I don't see him listed
graham4anything
Nov 2012
#177