Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

former9thward

(33,027 posts)
2. Nixon was not charged criminally.
Sun Jan 14, 2024, 12:44 PM
Jan 2024

In fact, in Nixon v. Fitzgerald, 457 U.S. 731 (1982) the Supreme Court agreed with Nixon that a president has absolute immunity when it comes to civil actions against him as a result of his actions while president.

The court said:

“In view of the special nature of the President's constitutional office and functions, we think it appropriate to recognize absolute Presidential immunity from damages liability for acts within the ‘outer perimeter’ of his official responsibility.”

In other words, as long the action for which he is facing suit is within the broadest understanding of his function as President, the President is off the hook.

In the Jan. 6th case Trump is arguing his actions were that of president and Smith is saying they are not.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Seasoned DUers: Didn't we...»Reply #2