Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Anonymous did not stop Rove from stealing the election. [View all]Unknown Beatle
(2,672 posts)61. You're right.
2000 and 2004. Late night and a coupla drinks later.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
119 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
I don't know why so many people find it hard to understand that Obama kicked ass... nt
Comrade_McKenzie
Nov 2012
#1
How does giving someone credit for doing one thing equal giving credit for doing another?
aandegoons
Nov 2012
#34
I agree-Of course Obama won because he is the better candidate- no one is disputing that
RepublicansRZombies
Nov 2012
#68
We know that. But, had the votes been closer, we would have been vulnerable to "hacking".
ladjf
Nov 2012
#52
I don't believe Anonymous stopped Rove from stealing the election, either, but
BlueCaliDem
Nov 2012
#6
Ohio IS NOT irrelevant and NEVER WILL BE. Every VOTE COUNTS so all votes should be COUNTED.
Tigress DEM
Nov 2012
#11
Didn't people work their butts off in 2000 and 2004 too? But those elections were stolen, in part by
DesertDiamond
Nov 2012
#17
PossumSqueezins your attitude towards North Carolina is BS and uncalled for.
Ford_Prefect
Nov 2012
#23
Unfortunately, 65,777 votes were flipped from Santorum to Romney in the primary.
reusrename
Nov 2012
#70
Anonymous could prove it if they did. They haven't so likely, they didn't.
AtheistCrusader
Nov 2012
#22
If they can send an anonymous email, they can send a printout of the code they found.
randome
Nov 2012
#36
Yes, I'm sure thwarting his evil election plans would be totally safe, but providing evidence of the
AtheistCrusader
Nov 2012
#58
If that were the case, they would have NEVER CLAIMED CREDIT AT ALL. PERIOD.
AtheistCrusader
Nov 2012
#74
"It is naive to think that Rove did not believe he had a "fix" in place..."
marions ghost
Nov 2012
#44
Rove is a bit blind about his abilities and his opposition. He is a control freak not a realist
Ford_Prefect
Nov 2012
#64
You seem to assume Anonymous somehow owes responsibility to America. They clearly do not think so.
Ford_Prefect
Nov 2012
#88
So...they should be cheered because they ensured the next election will be hacked?
jeff47
Nov 2012
#93
The case against EV was made long ago by much wiser folk than me. The proofs likewise are already
Ford_Prefect
Nov 2012
#96
Again, all hacks to date require changing the software or attaching hardware to the machine
jeff47
Nov 2012
#109
If Anonymous did anything it was by definition outside the law. Are you leading the investigation
Ford_Prefect
Nov 2012
#114
So, let's follow the trail of evidence and figure out who created the big fraud and why.
Coyotl
Nov 2012
#38
Obama and his campaign won the election. Anonymous may have protected the vote.
Barack_America
Nov 2012
#39
If they did it why would they try to engage the corrupted justice system they clearly mistrust?
Ford_Prefect
Nov 2012
#67
ever hear of devil's advocate. Rove is a player in an organization. Not the head, just a player.
graham4anything
Nov 2012
#83
Exactly, a good player has no use for a conscience, it's just an impediment, a drag on potential
Fumesucker
Nov 2012
#84
I was on Bartcop back during the recount brouhaha, we had it figured out in near real-time there
Fumesucker
Nov 2012
#89
If only a simple tweet then could have alerted the entire world while it happened
graham4anything
Nov 2012
#97
Just stop. Nobody is saying Obama didn't win. Please stop wasting everybody's time with nonsense
BlueStreak
Nov 2012
#102