Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

muriel_volestrangler

(101,294 posts)
32. It's the perfect conspiracy theory - the proof is *NOTHING HAPPENED*, because there were 2
Mon Nov 19, 2012, 05:21 PM
Nov 2012

conspiracies. Thus the first, evil, conspiracy was cancelled by the second, virtuous, conspiracy - and the proof is that the election was won by Obama, just as the opinion polls and Nate Sivler predicted!

You can't let a simple thing like the absence of evidence get in the way of the need for conspiracy theories to shout about. All the proof needed that Karl Rove was up to something nefarious was that he had a sad on election night, which must mean he had been foiled in illegal activity. It couldn't possibly mean just that his theory, effectively racist, that Obama's support was too lazy to turn out and vote, had been proved wrong. That just wouldn't make him evil enough.

Yes...it's about the patches. FarPoint Nov 2012 #1
Has Husted Been Heard From Since The Election?...... global1 Nov 2012 #2
Not a peep from Husted as far as I know... FarPoint Nov 2012 #24
Husted saw results . . . brush Nov 2012 #15
That is my first impression... FarPoint Nov 2012 #25
Neither had any effect on the outcome. longship Nov 2012 #3
Sometimes I feel like we are a mirror of FreeRepublic or redstate OKNancy Nov 2012 #4
Yep, and those who put all faith in the CT damn those who point out their folly RomneyLies Nov 2012 #7
This message was self-deleted by its author RobertEarl Nov 2012 #21
Folly? RobertEarl Nov 2012 #23
Where is the transparency? Lars39 Nov 2012 #5
Do you mean other than the thousands of observers? longship Nov 2012 #12
Programming naivete Lars39 Nov 2012 #17
If they wanted transparency, the would hand count paper ballots in every precinct on CATV bahrbearian Nov 2012 #19
You don't think there are observers watching the count? longship Nov 2012 #27
If anything of the kind happened, the evidence is gone Occulus Nov 2012 #13
Well, if it happened it didn't work very well. longship Nov 2012 #29
It's the perfect conspiracy theory - the proof is *NOTHING HAPPENED*, because there were 2 muriel_volestrangler Nov 2012 #32
It is NOT about REALITY! It's about those "conspiracy theories." RomneyLies Nov 2012 #6
And here's the thing: MineralMan Nov 2012 #8
But don't you see? Some anonymous person on the internet says they blocked the GOP from stealing it! RomneyLies Nov 2012 #10
I suppose you won't believe I am a male model from France either.... rzemanfl Nov 2012 #14
It is so dangerous to see the small picture. robinlynne Nov 2012 #11
So just forget about 2000 and 2004, right got it, Move On nothing to See bahrbearian Nov 2012 #20
Nobody flipped electeonic votes in 2000 or 2004 RomneyLies Nov 2012 #26
Thank-you!!!! robinlynne Nov 2012 #9
Well, SOMETHING, as my father would say, put a burr under Rove's tail. rocktivity Nov 2012 #16
Oh, the confusion: ProSense Nov 2012 #18
The Florida recount in 2000 seemed so deliberately shaped to turn off the public from hand counting Overseas Nov 2012 #22
If the claimant had any credibility to start with, bringing in ORCA would have wrecked it. Orangepeel Nov 2012 #28
I agree with the thesis of this post. Stevepol Nov 2012 #30
I'm just going to kick my own post instead of starting another one. Sheesh. Atman Nov 2012 #31
'Even a "conspiracy theory" should have some basis in fact' muriel_volestrangler Nov 2012 #33
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»It is NOT about ORCA! It'...»Reply #32