Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Ok... It's From The Examiner... Re: Anonymous/Rove/Ohio... And Here's The Author: [View all]grantcart
(53,061 posts)66. Do what? Very difficult to follow a conversation with you
You were making an argument that illegally obtained evidence is not admissable and I was pointing out that it was quite common (Pawn shop owner gets a break from the police by giving up the thief that gave it to him. Evidence from the pawn broker was obtained without a warrant and is in fact a crime itself but is used to prosecute the theif)
I don't think anonymous will comply with anything because it is quite obvious that they didn't do anything.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
81 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Ok... It's From The Examiner... Re: Anonymous/Rove/Ohio... And Here's The Author: [View all]
WillyT
Nov 2012
OP
Right. People are so afraid they question something that appears without evidence.
randome
Nov 2012
#80
I'm Just Putting Out What's In The News... Even The Author Recognizes It May Be A False Claim...
WillyT
Nov 2012
#8
It would help the debate if you could cite some credible sources that may support your claim
Kaleva
Nov 2012
#19
So these super hackers can't think of any way to put it into the public... Anonymously?
Ohio Joe
Nov 2012
#16
Illegally obtained evidence is admissible, as long as it isn't the government, or the government's
msanthrope
Nov 2012
#38
Those are strawmen arguments. No one said their firewall was unbreakable. It only had to be secure
rhett o rick
Nov 2012
#39