Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
it strikes me that wikipedia, while i find it useful as a quck reference, has a lot of HiPointDem Nov 2012 #1
Appears to me that the page was deleted five years ago LTR Nov 2012 #2
Perhaps I don't understand how something could be deleted on the 'Net... KansDem Nov 2012 #5
The link you provided isn't going anywhere LTR Nov 2012 #7
Ah, yes, I see now! KansDem Nov 2012 #8
And partly because it was a duplicate article. Xithras Nov 2012 #21
No, the duplication wasn't the issue. Jim Lane Nov 2012 #22
Quid Pro Quo? Rove made a sizable donation to the site during their latest fund-raising effort? mojowork_n Nov 2012 #3
There is no Rove-Wikipedia controversy LTR Nov 2012 #4
Marching in lockstep is not the preferred model. mojowork_n Nov 2012 #17
Okay, well how about THIS analogy LTR Nov 2012 #18
Those darned cats. mojowork_n Nov 2012 #19
The problem isn't Rove, it's the laziness of the left. Jim Lane Nov 2012 #12
I fully support Jim Wales' idea of edits being approved. dixiegrrrrl Nov 2012 #14
Thanks for the clarification. mojowork_n Nov 2012 #15
Oops. Replied to the wrong post. mojowork_n Nov 2012 #16
Post removed Post removed Nov 2012 #6
wikipedia is deeply censored by the powers that be NoMoreWarNow Nov 2012 #9
Proof? Android3.14 Nov 2012 #10
well there are abundant examples-- NoMoreWarNow Nov 2012 #23
Complete and utter horsepoop Simeon Salus Nov 2012 #11
Wow. snot Nov 2012 #13
wiki trends conservative amborin Nov 2012 #20
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Wikipedia's "2004 U....»Reply #9